3 min read
Understanding the relationship between Automatic Clearing House (ACH) and Electronic Funds Transfer (EFT) payment methods is crucial for optimizing your business’s financial operations. While related, these terms represent different concepts—ACH is actually a type of EFT—with important distinctions in processing time, cost and functionality.
Knowing when to use each method can significantly impact your payment efficiency and bottom line.
Our team can help you navigate the right payment types and systems for your business.
EFT is an umbrella term for any digital method of moving money between accounts, either within the same bank or across different banks. ACH transactions are one type of EFT; others include wire transfers, credit card payments and real-time payments (RTP). EFTs use a variety of payment networks and systems.
The term ACH stands for Automated Clearing House, a U.S.-based network that processes batched electronic payments between bank accounts. ACH transactions are a type of EFT used for direct deposits as well as other payment types, such as electronic checks (eChecks) and peer-to-peer payments.
ACH transactions are facilitated by an operator—either the Federal Reserve or The Clearing House. The governing body that manages and promotes the ACH network is called Nacha.
Here are some of the main distinctions between ACH payments and other EFT types:
Feature | ACH | Other EFT Types |
---|---|---|
Processing method | Batch processing | Individual (wires); varied (others) |
Settlement speed | 1-3 days; same-day available | Minutes to hours (wires); immediate (some RTPs) |
Cost | Lower; little or no fee | Higher; $15-50 (wires) or more for other types |
Geographic reach | Most commonly U.S., international use limited | Domestic and international |
Volume capacity | Low value, high volume | Low volume, high value (wires), variable (card and RTP) |
You can choose among several payment and processing types, depending on your specific needs:
Special care should be taken when choosing a payment type for international and cross-border payments.
While ACH payments can be made internationally (a practice known as International ACH Transfers or Global ACH), this payment option involves unique drawbacks as well as advantages when compared with international wires.
An IAT facilitates international payments by involving a foreign bank in the transaction, either to send or receive money. They are often less expensive than international wire transfers. However, international ACH transfers can come with potentially unexpected fees. Not all banks support them and they can take significantly longer than domestic ACH transfers. Additionally, ACH payments to international recipients can only be delivered in local currency, making them potentially subject to currency exchange fees and international regulations and controls. IAT is a good option for low-value, non-urgent cross-border payments.
International wires are often preferred over IAT payments for faster processing times, U.S. currency support, ability to handle large sums and broader international acceptance than international ACH payments. However, cross-border wires are likely to incur processing fees charged by each bank in the transmission chain (known as “lifting fees”). International wires are ideal for high-dollar and critical payments.
J.P. Morgan is committed to developing and offering end-to-end payables and receivables solutions to help support your needs and objectives.
To learn more, please contact your J.P. Morgan representative or visit our treasury solutions page.
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. Member FDIC. Visit jpmorgan.com/commercial-banking/legal-disclaimer for disclosures and disclaimers related to this content.