The personal attention of a one-on-one relationship.
The strength of a global financial leader.

Forbes/SHOOK Top Wealth Management Teams Best-In-State

2023

Forbes/SHOOK Top Wealth Management Teams Best-In-State (1/12/23). Data as of 3/31/22. The Forbes/SHOOK Top Wealth Management Teams Best-In-State ranking was developed by SHOOK Research and is based on in-person, virtual and telephone due diligence meetings and a ranking algorithm that includes: a measure of each team’s best practices, client retention, industry experience, review of compliance records, firm nominations; and quantitative criteria, including: assets under management and revenue generated for their firms. Investment performance is not a criterion because client objectives and risk tolerances vary, and advisors rarely have audited performance reports. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

Forbes/SHOOK America’s Top Wealth Management Teams

2022

Forbes America’s Top Wealth Management Teams (11/8/22). Data as of 3/31/22. Forbes America’s Top Wealth Management Teams ranking was developed by SHOOK Research and is based on in-person, virtual and telephone due diligence meetings and a ranking algorithm that includes: a measure of each team’s best practices, client retention, industry experience, review of compliance records, firm nominations; and quantitative criteria, including: assets under management and revenue generated for their firms. Investment performance is not a criterion because client objectives and risk tolerances vary, and advisors rarely have audited performance reports.  Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

Forbes/SHOOK Top Wealth Advisors

2023

Forbes/SHOOK Top Wealth Advisors (4/4/23). Data as of 6/30/22. The Forbes ranking of America’s Top Wealth Advisors is based on an algorithm of qualitative criteria, mostly gained through telephone and in-person due diligence interviews, and quantitative data. Those advisors that are considered have a minimum of seven years’ experience, and the algorithm weighs factors like revenue trends, assets under management, compliance records, industry experience and those that encompass best practices and approach to working with clients. Portfolio performance is not a criterion due to varying client objectives and lack of audited data. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced. 

2022

Forbes/SHOOK Top Wealth Advisors (8/24/22). Data as of 3/31/22. The Forbes ranking of America’s Top Wealth Advisors is based on an algorithm of qualitative criteria, mostly gained through telephone and in-person due diligence interviews, and quantitative data. Those advisors that are considered have a minimum of seven years’ experience, and the algorithm weighs factors like revenue trends, assets under management, compliance records, industry experience and those that encompass best practices and approach to working with clients. Portfolio performance is not a criterion due to varying client objectives and lack of audited data. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

2021

Forbes/SHOOK Top Wealth Advisors (8/24/21). Data as of 3/31/21. The Forbes ranking of America’s Top Wealth Advisors is based on an algorithm of qualitative criteria, mostly gained through telephone and in-person due diligence interviews, and quantitative data. Those advisors that are considered have a minimum of seven years’ experience, and the algorithm weighs factors like revenue trends, assets under management, compliance records, industry experience and those that encompass best practices and approach to working with clients. Portfolio performance is not a criterion due to varying client objectives and lack of audited data. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

2020

Forbes/SHOOK Top Wealth Advisors (8/25/20). Data as of 3/31/20. The Forbes ranking of America’s Top Wealth Advisors is based on an algorithm of qualitative criteria, mostly gained through telephone and in-person due diligence interviews, and quantitative data. Those advisors that are considered have a minimum of seven years’ experience, and the algorithm weighs factors like revenue trends, assets under management, compliance records, industry experience and those that encompass best practices in their practices and approach to working with clients. Portfolio performance is not a criterion due to varying client objectives and lack of audited data. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

2019

Forbes/SHOOK Top Wealth Advisors (9/10/19). Data as of 3/31/19. The Forbes ranking of America’s Top Wealth Advisors is based on an algorithm of qualitative criteria, mostly gained through telephone and in-person due diligence interviews, and quantitative data. Those advisors that are considered have a minimum of seven years’ experience, and the algorithm weighs factors like revenue trends, assets under management, compliance records, industry experience and those that encompass best practices in their practices and approach to working with clients. Portfolio performance is not a criterion due to varying client objectives and lack of audited data. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

2018

Forbes/SHOOK Top Wealth Advisors (9/12/18). Data as of 6/30/18. The Forbes ranking of America’s Top Wealth Advisors is based on an algorithm of qualitative criteria, mostly gained through telephone and in-person due diligence interviews, and quantitative data. Those advisors that are considered have a minimum of seven years experience, and the algorithm weighs factors like revenue trends, assets under management, compliance records, industry experience and those that encompass best practices in their practices and approach to working with clients. Portfolio performance is not a criterion due to varying client objectives and lack of audited data. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

2017

Forbes/SHOOK Top Wealth Advisors (9/26/17). Data as of 6/30/17. The Forbes ranking of America’s Top Wealth Advisors is based on an algorithm of qualitative criteria, mostly gained through telephone and in-person due diligence interviews, and quantitative data. Those advisors that are considered have a minimum of seven years experience, and the algorithm weighs factors like revenue trends, assets under management, compliance records, industry experience and those that encompass best practices in their practices and approach to working with clients. Portfolio performance is not a criterion due to varying client objectives and lack of audited data. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

2016

Forbes/SHOOK Top Wealth Advisors (8/3/16). Data as of 6/30/16. The Forbes ranking of America’s Top Wealth Advisors is based on an algorithm of qualitative criteria, mostly gained through telephone and in-person due diligence interviews, and quantitative data. Those advisors that are considered have a minimum of seven years experience, and the algorithm weighs factors like revenue trends, assets under management, compliance records, industry experience and those that encompass best practices in their practices and approach to working with clients. Portfolio performance is not a criterion due to varying client objectives and lack of audited data. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

Forbes/SHOOK Top Wealth Advisors Best-In State

2023

Forbes/SHOOK Top Wealth Advisors Best-In-State (4/4/23). Data as of 6/30/22. The Forbes ranking of Top Wealth Advisors Best-In-State is based on an algorithm of qualitative criteria, gained through telephone, virtual and in-person due diligence interviews, and quantitative data. Those advisors that are considered have a minimum of seven years experience, and the algorithm weighs factors like revenue trends, assets under management, compliance records, industry experience and those that encompass best practices in their approach to working with clients. Portfolio performance is not a criterion due to varying client objectives and lack of audited data. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

2022

Forbes/SHOOK Best-In-State Wealth Advisors (4/7/22). Data as of 6/30/21. The Forbes ranking of Best-In-State Wealth Advisors is based on an algorithm of qualitative criteria, gained through telephone, virtual and in-person due diligence interviews, and quantitative data. Those advisors that are considered have a minimum of seven years experience, and the algorithm weighs factors like revenue trends, assets under management, compliance records, industry experience and those that encompass best practices in their approach to working with clients. Portfolio performance is not a criterion due to varying client objectives and lack of audited data. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

2021

Forbes/SHOOK Best-In-State Wealth Advisors (2/11/21). Data as of 6/30/20. The Forbes ranking of Best-In-State Wealth Advisors is based on an algorithm of qualitative criteria, gained through telephone, virtual and in-person due diligence interviews, and quantitative data. Those advisors that are considered have a minimum of seven years experience, and the algorithm weights factors like revenue trends, assets under management, compliance records, industry experience and those that encompass best practices in their approach to working with clients. Portfolio performance is not a criteria due to varying client objectives and lack of audited data. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

2020

Forbes/SHOOK Best-In-State Wealth Advisors (1/6/20). Data as of 6/30/19. The Forbes ranking of Best-In-State Wealth Advisors is based on an algorithm of qualitative criteria, mostly gained through telephone and in-person due diligence interviews, and quantitative data. Those advisors that are considered have a minimum of seven years experience, and the algorithm weights factors like revenue trends, assets under management, compliance records, industry experience and those that encompass best practices in their practices and approach to working with clients. Portfolio performance is not a criteria due to varying client objectives and lack of audited data. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

2019

Forbes/SHOOK Best-In-State Wealth Advisors (2/20/19). Data as of 6/30/18. The Forbes ranking of Best-In-State Wealth Advisors is based on an algorithm of qualitative criteria, mostly gained through telephone and in-person due diligence interviews, and quantitative data. Those advisors that are considered have a minimum of seven years experience, and the algorithm weights factors like revenue trends, assets under management, compliance records, industry experience and those that encompass best practices in their practices and approach to working with clients. Portfolio performance is not a criteria due to varying client objectives and lack of audited data.  Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

2018

Forbes/SHOOK Best-In-State Wealth Advisors (2/15/18). Data as of 6/30/17. The Forbes ranking of Best-In-State Wealth Advisors is based on an algorithm of qualitative criteria, mostly gained through telephone and in-person due diligence interviews, and quantitative data. Those advisors that are considered have a minimum of seven years experience, and the algorithm weights factors like revenue trends, assets under management, compliance records, industry experience and those that encompass best practices in their practices and approach to working with clients. Portfolio performance is not a criteria due to varying client objectives and lack of audited data. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

Forbes/SHOOK Top Women Wealth Advisors

2023

Forbes/SHOOK Top Women Wealth Advisors (2/1/23). Data as of 9/30/22. The Forbes ranking of America’s Top Women Wealth Advisors ranking is based on in-person, virtual and telephone due diligence meetings to evaluate each advisor qualitatively, a major component of a ranking algorithm that includes: client impact, industry experience, review of best practices and compliance records, firm nominations; and quantitative criteria, including: assets under management and revenue generated for their firms. Investment performance is not a criterion because client objectives and risk tolerances vary, and advisors rarely have audited performance reports. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

2022

Forbes/SHOOK Top Women Wealth Advisors (2/4/22). Data as of 9/30/21. The Forbes ranking of America’s Top Women Wealth Advisors and Top Women Wealth Advisors Best-In-State is based on an algorithm of qualitative data, learned through surveys and interviews conducting in-person, by telephone and virtually to evaluate best practices, level of service, investing models and compliance records as well as quantitative data, such as revenue trends and assets under management. All advisors have a minimum of seven years’ experience. Portfolio performance is not a criteria due to varying client objectives and lack of audited data. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

2021

Forbes/SHOOK Top Women Wealth Advisors (3/24/21). Data as of 9/30/20. The Forbes ranking of America’s Top Women Wealth Advisors is based on an algorithm of qualitative data, learned through surveys and interviews (in-person, telephone and virtual), so we can evaluate best practices, service and investing models, compliance records, etc.; as well as quantitative data, like revenue trends and assets under management. All advisors have a minimum of seven years’ experience. Portfolio performance is not a criteria due to varying client objectives and lack of audited data. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

2020

Forbes/SHOOK Top Women Wealth Advisors (4/21/20). Data as of 9/30/19. The Forbes ranking of America’s Top Women Wealth Advisors is based on an algorithm of qualitative data, such as telephone and in-person interviews, a review of best practices, service and investing models, and compliance records; as well as quantitative data, like revenue trends and assets under management. All advisors have a minimum of seven years’ experience. Portfolio performance is not a criteria due to varying client objectives and lack of audited data.

2019

Forbes/SHOOK Top Women Wealth Advisors (4/30/19). Data as of 9/30/18. The Forbes ranking of America’s Top Women Wealth Advisors is based on an algorithm of qualitative and quantitative data, rating thousands of wealth advisors with a minimum of seven years of experience and weighing factors like revenue trends, assets under management, compliance records, industry experience and best practices learned through telephone and in-person interviews. Portfolio performance is not a criteria due to varying client objectives and lack of audited data. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced. 

2018

Forbes/SHOOK Top Women Wealth Advisors (5/1/18). Data as of 9/30/17. The Forbes ranking of America’s Top Women Wealth Advisors is based on an algorithm of qualitative and quantitative data, rating thousands of wealth advisors with a minimum of seven years of experience and weighing factors like revenue trends, assets under management, compliance records, industry experience and best practices learned through telephone and in-person interviews. Portfolio performance is not a criteria due to varying client objectives and lack of audited data. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced. 

2017

Forbes/SHOOK Top Women Wealth Advisors (2/28/17). Data as of 9/30/16. The Forbes ranking of America’s Top Women Wealth Advisors is based on an algorithm of qualitative and quantitative data, rating thousands of wealth advisors with a minimum of seven years of experience and weighing factors like revenue trends, assets under management, compliance records, industry experience and best practices learned through telephone and in-person interviews. Portfolio performance is not a criteria due to varying client objectives and lack of audited data. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced. 

Forbes/SHOOK Top Women Wealth Advisors Best-In-State

2023

Forbes/SHOOK Top Women Wealth Advisors Best-In-State (2/1/23). Data as of 9/30/22. The Forbes ranking of Top Women Wealth Advisors Best-In-State is based on in-person, virtual and telephone due diligence meetings to evaluate each advisor qualitatively, a major component of a ranking algorithm that includes: client impact, industry experience, review of best practices and compliance records, firm nominations; and quantitative criteria, including: assets under management and revenue generated for their firms. Investment performance is not a criterion because client objectives and risk tolerances vary, and advisors rarely have audited performance reports. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

2022

Forbes/SHOOK Top Women Wealth Advisors Best-In-State (2/4/22). Data as of 9/30/21. The Forbes ranking of Top Women Wealth Advisors Best-In-State is based on an algorithm of qualitative data, learned through surveys and interviews conducting in-person, by telephone and virtually to evaluate best practices, level of service, investing models and compliance records as well as quantitative data, such as revenue trends and assets under management. All advisors have a minimum of seven years’ experience. Portfolio performance is not a criteria due to varying client objectives and lack of audited data.Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

2021

Forbes/SHOOK Top Women Wealth Advisors Best-In-State (3/24/21). Data as of 9/30/20. The Forbes ranking of Top Women Wealth Advisors Best-In-State is based on an algorithm of: qualitative data, learned through surveys and interviews (in-person, telephone and virtual), so we can evaluate best practices, service and investing models, compliance records, etc.; as well as quantitative data, like revenue trends and assets under management. All advisors have a minimum of seven years’ experience. Portfolio performance is not a criteria due to varying client objectives and lack of audited data.Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

2020

Forbes/SHOOK Top Women Wealth Advisors Best-In-State (4/21/20). Data as of 9/30/19. The Forbes ranking of Top Women Wealth Advisors Best-In-State is based on an algorithm of: qualitative data, such as telephone and in-person interviews, a review of best practices, service and investing models, and compliance records; as well as quantitative data, like revenue trends and assets under management. All advisors have a minimum of seven years’ experience. Portfolio performance is not a criteria due to varying client objectives and lack of audited data. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

2019

Forbes/SHOOK Top Women Wealth Advisors Best-In-State (4/30/19). Data as of 9/30/18. TThe Forbes ranking of Top Women Wealth Advisors Best-In-State is based on an algorithm of qualitative and quantitative data, rating thousands of wealth advisors with a minimum of seven years of experience and weighing factors like revenue trends, assets under management, compliance records, industry experience and best practices learned through telephone and in-person interviews. Portfolio performance is not a criteria due to varying client objectives and lack of audited data. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

2018

Forbes/SHOOK Top Women Wealth Advisors Best-In-State (5/1/18). Data as of 9/30/17. The Forbes ranking of Top Women Wealth Advisors Best-In-State is based on an algorithm of qualitative and quantitative data, rating thousands of wealth advisors with a minimum of seven years of experience and weighing factors like revenue trends, assets under management, compliance records, industry experience and best practices learned through telephone and in-person interviews. Portfolio performance is not a criteria due to varying client objectives and lack of audited data. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

2017

Forbes/SHOOK Top Women Wealth Advisors Best-In-State (2/28/17). Data as of 9/30/16. The Forbes ranking of Top Women Wealth Advisors Best-In-State is based on an algorithm of qualitative and quantitative data, rating thousands of wealth advisors with a minimum of seven years of experience and weighing factors like revenue trends, assets under management, compliance records, industry experience and best practices learned through telephone and in-person interviews. Portfolio performance is not a criteria due to varying client objectives and lack of audited data.Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced. 

Forbes/SHOOK Top Next-Gen Wealth Advisors

2022

Forbes/SHOOK Top Next-Gen Wealth Advisors (8/3/22). Data as of 3/31/22. The Forbes Next-Gen Wealth Advisors rankings is based on an algorithm of qualitative criterion—mostly gained through telephone and in-person due diligence interviews—and quantitative data. Those advisors that are considered have a minimum of four years' experience, and the algorithm weighs factors like revenue trends, assets under management, compliance records, industry experience and those that encompass the highest standards of best practices. Portfolio performance is not a criterion due to varying client objectives and lack of audited data.  Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

2021

Forbes/SHOOK Top Next-Gen Wealth Advisors (9/21/22). Data as of 3/31/21. The Forbes Next-Gen Wealth Advisors rankings is based on an algorithm of qualitative criterion, mostly gained through telephone and in-person due diligence interviews, and quantitative data. Those advisors that are considered have a minimum of four years' experience, and the algorithm weighs factors like revenue trends, assets under management, compliance records, industry experience and those that encompass the highest standards of best practices. Portfolio performance is not a criterion due to varying client objectives and lack of audited data. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced. 

2020

Forbes/SHOOK Top Next-Gen Wealth Advisors (7/22/20). Data as of 3/31/20. The Forbes Next-Gen Wealth Advisors rankings is based on an algorithm of qualitative criterion, mostly gained through telephone and in-person due diligence interviews, and quantitative data. Those advisors that are considered have a minimum of four years' experience, and the algorithm weighs factors like revenue trends, assets under management, compliance records, industry experience and those that encompass the highest standards of best practices. Portfolio performance is not a criterion due to varying client objectives and lack of audited data. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced. 

2019

Forbes/SHOOK Top Next-Gen Wealth Advisors (6/25/19). Data as of 3/31/19. The Forbes Next-Gen Wealth Advisors rankings is based on an algorithm of qualitative criterion, mostly gained through telephone and in-person due diligence interviews, and quantitative data. Those advisors that are considered have a minimum of four years' experience, and the algorithm weighs factors like revenue trends, assets under management, compliance records, industry experience and those that encompass the highest standards of best practices. Portfolio performance is not a criterion due to varying client objectives and lack of audited data. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced. 

2018

Forbes/SHOOK Top Next-Gen Wealth Advisors (7/25/18). Data as of 3/31/18. The Forbes Next-Gen Wealth Advisors rankings is based on an algorithm of qualitative criterion, mostly gained through telephone and in-person due diligence interviews, and quantitative data. Those advisors that are considered have a minimum of four years' experience, and the algorithm weighs factors like revenue trends, assets under management, compliance records, industry experience and those that encompass the highest standards of best practices. Portfolio performance is not a criterion due to varying client objectives and lack of audited data. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced. 

2017

Forbes/SHOOK Top Next-Gen Wealth Advisors (7/25/17). Data as of 3/31/17. The Forbes Next-Gen Wealth Advisors rankings is based on an algorithm of qualitative criterion, mostly gained through telephone and in-person due diligence interviews, and quantitative data. Those advisors that are considered have a minimum of four years' experience, and the algorithm weighs factors like revenue trends, assets under management, compliance records, industry experience and those that encompass the highest standards of best practices. Portfolio performance is not a criterion due to varying client objectives and lack of audited data. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced. 

Working Mother/SHOOK Top Wealth Advisor Moms

2021

Working Mother/SHOOK Top Wealth Advisor Moms (10/12/21). Data as of 3/31/21. SHOOK™ Research considered women advisors with children living at home under 21 years old. Ranking algorithm is based on qualitative measures derived from telephone and in-person interviews and surveys: service models, investing process, client retention, industry experience, review of compliance records, firm nominations, etc.; and quantitative criteria, such as assets under management and revenue generated for their firms. Investment performance is not a criteria because client objectives and risk tolerances vary, and advisors rarely have audited performance reports. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

2020

Working Mother/SHOOK Top Wealth Advisor Moms (9/21/20). Data as of 3/31/20. SHOOK™ Research considered women advisors with children living at home under 21 years old. Ranking algorithm is based on qualitative measures derived from telephone and in-person interviews and surveys: service models, investing process, client retention, industry experience, review of compliance records, firm nominations, etc.; and quantitative criteria, such as assets under management and revenue generated for their firms. Investment performance is not a criteria because client objectives and risk tolerances vary, and advisors rarely have audited performance reports. Rankings are based on the opinions of SHOOK Research, LLC. Past performance is not an indication of future results.  Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

2019

Working Mother/SHOOK Top Wealth Advisor Moms (10/2/19). Data as of 3/31/19. SHOOK™ Research considered women advisors with children living at home under 21 years old. Ranking algorithm is based on qualitative measures derived from telephone and in-person interviews and surveys: service models, investing process, client retention, industry experience, review of compliance records, firm nominations, etc.; and quantitative criteria, such as assets under management and revenue generated for their firms. Investment performance is not a criteria because client objectives and risk tolerances vary, and advisors rarely have audited performance reports. Rankings are based on the opinions of SHOOK Research, LLC. Past performance is not an indication of future results.  Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

2018

Working Mother/SHOOK Top Wealth Advisor Moms (10/8/18). Data as of 3/31/18. SHOOK™ Research considered women advisors with children living at home under 21 years old. Ranking algorithm is based on qualitative measures derived from telephone and in-person interviews and surveys: service models, investing process, client retention, industry experience, review of compliance records, firm nominations, etc.; and quantitative criteria, such as assets under management and revenue generated for their firms. Investment performance is not a criteria because client objectives and risk tolerances vary, and advisors rarely have audited performance reports. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

2017

Working Mother/SHOOK Top Wealth Advisor Moms (10/3/17). Data as of 3/31/17. SHOOK™ Research considered women advisors with children living at home under 21 years old. Ranking algorithm is based on qualitative measures derived from telephone and in-person interviews and surveys: service models, investing process, client retention, industry experience, review of compliance records, firm nominations, etc.; and quantitative criteria, such as assets under management and revenue generated for their firms. Investment performance is not a criteria because client objectives and risk tolerances vary, and advisors rarely have audited performance reports. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

Barron’s Top 100 Financial Advisors

2023

Barron’s Top 100 Financial Advisors (4/14/23). Data as of 12/31/22. Barron's ranks the top financial advisors based on assets under management, revenues generated by the advisors for their firms, and the quality of advisors' practices. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

2022

Barron’s Top 100 Financial Advisors (4/15/22). Data as of 12/31/21. Barron's ranks the top financial advisors based on assets under management, revenues generated by the advisors for their firms, and the quality of advisors' practices. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

2021

Barron’s Top 100 Financial Advisors (4/16/21). Data as of 12/31/20. Barron's ranks the top financial advisors based on assets under management, revenues generated by the advisors for their firms, and the quality of advisors' practices. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced

2020

Barron’s Top 100 Financial Advisors (4/20/20). Data as of 12/31/19. Barron's ranks the top financial advisors based on assets under management, revenues generated by the advisors for their firms, and the quality of advisors' practices. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

2019

Barron’s Top 100 Financial Advisors (4/22/19). Data as of 12/31/18. Barron's ranks the top financial advisors based on assets under management, revenues generated by the advisors for their firms, and the quality of advisors' practices. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

2018

Barron’s Top 100 Financial Advisors (4/21/18). Data as of 12/31/17. Barron's ranks the top financial advisors based on assets under management, revenues generated by the advisors for their firms, and the quality of advisors' practices. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

2017

Barron’s Top 100 Financial Advisors (4/15/17). Data as of 12/31/16. Barron's ranks the top financial advisors based on assets under management, revenues generated by the advisors for their firms, and the quality of advisors' practices. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

2016

Barron’s Top 100 Financial Advisors (4/16/16). Data as of 12/31/2015. Barron's ranks the top financial advisors based on assets under management, revenues generated by the advisors for their firms, and the quality of advisors' practices. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

Barron's Top 100 Women Financial Advisors

2022

Barron’s Top Women Financial Advisors (6/17/22). Data as of 3/31/22. Barron's ranks the top women financial advisors based on assets under management, revenues generated by the advisors for their firms, and the quality of advisors' practices. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

2021

Barron’s Top Women Financial Advisors (6/18/21). Data as of 3/31/21. Barron's ranks the top women financial advisors based on assets under management, revenues generated by the advisors for their firms, and the quality of advisors' practices. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

2020

Barron’s Top Women Financial Advisors (7/17/20). Data as of 3/31/20. Barron's ranks the top women financial advisors based on assets under management, revenues generated by the advisors for their firms, and the quality of advisors' practices. Fee paid to publication for advertisement materials after rating announced.

2019

Barron’s Top Women Financial Advisors (6/7/19). Data as of 3/31/19. Barron's ranks the top women financial advisors based on assets under management, revenues generated by the advisors for their firms, and the quality of advisors' practices. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

2018

Barron’s Top Women Financial Advisors (6/8/18). Data as of 3/31/18. Barron's ranks the top women financial advisors based on assets under management, revenues generated by the advisors for their firms, and the quality of advisors' practices. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

2017

Barron’s Top Women Financial Advisors (6/15/17). Data as of 3/31/17. Barron's ranks the top women financial advisors based on assets under management, revenues generated by the advisors for their firms, and the quality of advisors' practices. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

2016

Barron’s Top Women Financial Advisors (6/4/16). Data as of 3/31/16. Barron's ranks the top women financial advisors based on assets under management, revenues generated by the advisors for their firms, and the quality of advisors' practices. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced

Barron's Top 1,200 Advisors

2023

Barron’s Top 1,200 U.S. Financial Advisors (3/10/23). Data as of 9/30/22. Barron's ranks the top 1,200 U.S. financial advisors based on assets under management, revenues generated by the advisors for their firms, and the quality of advisors' practices. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced

2022

Barron’s Top 1,200 U.S. Financial Advisors (3/11/22). Data as of 9/30/21. Barron's ranks the top 1,200 U.S. financial advisors based on assets under management, revenues generated by the advisors for their firms, and the quality of advisors' practices. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

2021

Barron’s Top 1,200 U.S. Financial Advisors (3/12/21). Data as of 9/30/20. Barron's ranks the top 1,200 U.S. financial advisors based on assets under management, revenues generated by the advisors for their firms, and the quality of advisors' practices. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

2020

Barron’s Top 1,200 U.S. Financial Advisors (3/13/20). Data as of 9/30/19. Barron's ranks the top 1,200 U.S. financial advisors based on assets under management, revenues generated by the advisors for their firms, and the quality of advisors' practices. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

2019

Barron’s Top 1,200 U.S. Financial Advisors (3/8/19). Data as of 9/30/18. Barron's ranks the top 1,200 U.S. financial advisors based on assets under management, revenues generated by the advisors for their firms, and the quality of advisors' practices. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

2018

Barron’s Top 1,200 U.S. Financial Advisors (3/8/18). Data as of 9/30/17. Barron's ranks the top 1,200 U.S. financial advisors based on assets under management, revenues generated by the advisors for their firms, and the quality of advisors' practices. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

2017

Barron’s Top 1,200 U.S. Financial Advisors (3/15/17). Data as of 9/30/16. Barron's ranks the top 1,200 U.S. financial advisors based on assets under management, revenues generated by the advisors for their firms, and the quality of advisors' practices. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced

2016

Barron’s Top 1,200 U.S. Financial Advisors (3/5/16). Data as of 9/30/2015. Barron's ranks the top 1,200 U.S. financial advisors based on assets under management, revenues generated by the advisors for their firms, and the quality of advisors' practices. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

Barron's Top 100 Private Wealth Management Teams

2022

Barron’s Top 100 Private Wealth Management Teams (4/15/22). Data as of 12/31/21. Barron's ranks the top 100 private wealth management teams based on assets under management, revenues generated by the advisors for their firms, and the quality of advisors' practices. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

2021

Barron’s Top 100 Private Wealth Management Teams (4/16/21). Data as of 12/31/20. Barron's ranks the top 100 private wealth management teams based on assets under management, revenues generated by the advisors for their firms, and the quality of advisors' practices. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

2020

Barron’s Top 100 Private Wealth Management Teams (4/20/20). Data as of 12/31/19. Barron's ranks the top 100 private wealth management teams based on assets under management, revenues generated by the advisors for their firms, and the quality of advisors' practices. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

2019

Barron’s Top 100 Private Wealth Management Teams (4/22/19). Data as of 12/31/18. Barron's ranks the top 100 private wealth management teams based on assets under management, revenues generated by the advisors for their firms, and the quality of advisors' practices. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced

Barron's Top 50 Private Wealth Management Teams

2020

Barron’s Top 50 Private Wealth Management Teams (4/20/20). Data as of 12/31/19. Barron’s ranks the top 50 private wealth management teams based on size, shape, regulatory records and credentials of their members and the resources they have to serve their clients. The teams listed specialize in managing wealth on behalf of individuals and families. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

2019

Barron’s Top 50 Private Wealth Management Teams (4/22/19). Data as of 12/31/18. Barron’s ranks the top 50 private wealth management teams based on size, shape, regulatory records and credentials of their members and the resources they have to serve their clients. The teams listed specialize in managing wealth on behalf of individuals and families. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

Financial Planning 40 Under 40

2023

Financial Planning Top 40 Under 40 (2/1/23). Data as of 9/30/22. Nominees for the rankings were 39 or younger as of Dec. 31, 2022, and were registered with a wealth management firm in the employee channel. FP uses production totals that are verified by each broker's employer to determine the rankings. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

2022

Financial Planning Top 40 Under 40 (2/1/22). Data as of 9/30/21. Nominees for the rankings were 39 or younger as of Dec. 31, 2021, and were registered with a wealth management firm in the employee channel. FP uses production totals that are verified by each broker's employer to determine the rankings. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

2021

Financial Planning Top 40 Under 40 (1/25/21-1/26/21). Data as of 9/30/20. Nominees for the rankings were 39 or younger as of Dec. 31, 2021, and were registered with a wealth management firm in the employee channel. FP uses production totals that are verified by each broker's employer to determine the rankings. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

NAPA Top DC Advisor Teams

2021

National Association of Plan Advisors (NAPA) Top DC Advisor Teams (3/22/22). Data as of 12/31/21. The NAPA Top DC Advisor Team list highlights the nation’s leading retirement plan advisor firms. The list focuses on teams, broadly defined as being in a single physical location, and having at least $100 million in DC assets under advisement. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

2020

National Association of Plan Advisors (NAPA) Top DC Advisor Teams (3/15/21). Data as of 12/31/20. The NAPA Top DC Advisor Team list highlights the nation’s leading retirement plan advisor firms. The list focuses on teams, broadly defined as being in a single physical location, and having at least $100 million in DC assets under advisement. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

Financial Advisor IQ Leadership Council

2021

Financial Advisor IQ Leadership Council (11/22/21). Data as of 7/21. To qualify, advisors must manage or advise on at least $50 million in assets, have three or more years of experience as a financial advisor/broker, maintain an excellent compliance record, and express a desire to engage with industry issues. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.