We no longer support this browser. Using a supported browser will provide a better experience.

Please update your browser.

Close browser message

J.P. Morgan Wealth Management Award Disclosures

Forbes/SHOOK Top Wealth Management Teams Best-In-State

2023

Forbes/SHOOK Top Wealth Management Teams Best-In-State (1/12/23). Data as of 3/31/22. The Forbes/SHOOK Top Wealth Management Teams Best-In-State ranking was developed by SHOOK Research and is based on in-person, virtual and telephone due diligence meetings and a ranking algorithm that includes: a measure of each team’s best practices, client retention, industry experience, review of compliance records, firm nominations; and quantitative criteria, including: assets under management and revenue generated for their firms. Investment performance is not a criterion because client objectives and risk tolerances vary, and advisors rarely have audited performance reports. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

Forbes/SHOOK America’s Top Wealth Management Teams

2022

Forbes America’s Top Wealth Management Teams (11/8/22). Data as of 3/31/22. Forbes America’s Top Wealth Management Teams ranking was developed by SHOOK Research and is based on in-person, virtual and telephone due diligence meetings and a ranking algorithm that includes: a measure of each team’s best practices, client retention, industry experience, review of compliance records, firm nominations; and quantitative criteria, including: assets under management and revenue generated for their firms. Investment performance is not a criterion because client objectives and risk tolerances vary, and advisors rarely have audited performance reports.  Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

Forbes/SHOOK Top Wealth Advisors

2023

Forbes/SHOOK Top Wealth Advisors (4/4/23). Data as of 6/30/22. The Forbes ranking of America’s Top Wealth Advisors is based on an algorithm of qualitative criteria, mostly gained through telephone and in-person due diligence interviews, and quantitative data. Those advisors that are considered have a minimum of seven years’ experience, and the algorithm weighs factors like revenue trends, assets under management, compliance records, industry experience and those that encompass best practices and approach to working with clients. Portfolio performance is not a criterion due to varying client objectives and lack of audited data. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

2022

Forbes/SHOOK Top Wealth Advisors (8/24/22). Data as of 3/31/22. The Forbes ranking of America’s Top Wealth Advisors is based on an algorithm of qualitative criteria, mostly gained through telephone and in-person due diligence interviews, and quantitative data. Those advisors that are considered have a minimum of seven years’ experience, and the algorithm weighs factors like revenue trends, assets under management, compliance records, industry experience and those that encompass best practices and approach to working with clients. Portfolio performance is not a criterion due to varying client objectives and lack of audited data. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

2021

Forbes/SHOOK Top Wealth Advisors (8/24/21). Data as of 3/31/21. The Forbes ranking of America’s Top Wealth Advisors is based on an algorithm of qualitative criteria, mostly gained through telephone and in-person due diligence interviews, and quantitative data. Those advisors that are considered have a minimum of seven years’ experience, and the algorithm weighs factors like revenue trends, assets under management, compliance records, industry experience and those that encompass best practices and approach to working with clients. Portfolio performance is not a criterion due to varying client objectives and lack of audited data. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

2020

Forbes/SHOOK Top Wealth Advisors (8/25/20). Data as of 3/31/20. The Forbes ranking of America’s Top Wealth Advisors is based on an algorithm of qualitative criteria, mostly gained through telephone and in-person due diligence interviews, and quantitative data. Those advisors that are considered have a minimum of seven years’ experience, and the algorithm weighs factors like revenue trends, assets under management, compliance records, industry experience and those that encompass best practices in their practices and approach to working with clients. Portfolio performance is not a criterion due to varying client objectives and lack of audited data. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

2019

Forbes/SHOOK Top Wealth Advisors (9/10/19). Data as of 3/31/19. The Forbes ranking of America’s Top Wealth Advisors is based on an algorithm of qualitative criteria, mostly gained through telephone and in-person due diligence interviews, and quantitative data. Those advisors that are considered have a minimum of seven years’ experience, and the algorithm weighs factors like revenue trends, assets under management, compliance records, industry experience and those that encompass best practices in their practices and approach to working with clients. Portfolio performance is not a criterion due to varying client objectives and lack of audited data. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

2018

Forbes/SHOOK Top Wealth Advisors (9/12/18). Data as of 6/30/18. The Forbes ranking of America’s Top Wealth Advisors is based on an algorithm of qualitative criteria, mostly gained through telephone and in-person due diligence interviews, and quantitative data. Those advisors that are considered have a minimum of seven years experience, and the algorithm weighs factors like revenue trends, assets under management, compliance records, industry experience and those that encompass best practices in their practices and approach to working with clients. Portfolio performance is not a criterion due to varying client objectives and lack of audited data. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

2017

Forbes/SHOOK Top Wealth Advisors (9/26/17). Data as of 6/30/17. The Forbes ranking of America’s Top Wealth Advisors is based on an algorithm of qualitative criteria, mostly gained through telephone and in-person due diligence interviews, and quantitative data. Those advisors that are considered have a minimum of seven years experience, and the algorithm weighs factors like revenue trends, assets under management, compliance records, industry experience and those that encompass best practices in their practices and approach to working with clients. Portfolio performance is not a criterion due to varying client objectives and lack of audited data. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

2016

Forbes/SHOOK Top Wealth Advisors (8/3/16). Data as of 6/30/16. The Forbes ranking of America’s Top Wealth Advisors is based on an algorithm of qualitative criteria, mostly gained through telephone and in-person due diligence interviews, and quantitative data. Those advisors that are considered have a minimum of seven years experience, and the algorithm weighs factors like revenue trends, assets under management, compliance records, industry experience and those that encompass best practices in their practices and approach to working with clients. Portfolio performance is not a criterion due to varying client objectives and lack of audited data. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

Forbes/SHOOK Top Wealth Advisors Best-In State

2023

Forbes/SHOOK Top Wealth Advisors Best-In-State (4/4/23). Data as of 6/30/22. The Forbes ranking of Top Wealth Advisors Best-In-State is based on an algorithm of qualitative criteria, gained through telephone, virtual and in-person due diligence interviews, and quantitative data. Those advisors that are considered have a minimum of seven years experience, and the algorithm weighs factors like revenue trends, assets under management, compliance records, industry experience and those that encompass best practices in their approach to working with clients. Portfolio performance is not a criterion due to varying client objectives and lack of audited data. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

2022

Forbes/SHOOK Top Wealth Advisors Best-In State (4/7/22). Data as of 6/30/21. The Forbes ranking of Best-In-State Wealth Advisors is based on an algorithm of qualitative criteria, gained through telephone, virtual and in-person due diligence interviews, and quantitative data. Those advisors that are considered have a minimum of seven years experience, and the algorithm weighs factors like revenue trends, assets under management, compliance records, industry experience and those that encompass best practices in their approach to working with clients. Portfolio performance is not a criterion due to varying client objectives and lack of audited data. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

2021

Forbes/SHOOK Top Wealth Advisors Best-In State (2/11/21). Data as of 6/30/20. The Forbes ranking of Best-In-State Wealth Advisors is based on an algorithm of qualitative criteria, gained through telephone, virtual and in-person due diligence interviews, and quantitative data. Those advisors that are considered have a minimum of seven years experience, and the algorithm weights factors like revenue trends, assets under management, compliance records, industry experience and those that encompass best practices in their approach to working with clients. Portfolio performance is not a criteria due to varying client objectives and lack of audited data. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

2020

Forbes/SHOOK Top Wealth Advisors Best-In State (1/6/20). Data as of 6/30/19. The Forbes ranking of Best-In-State Wealth Advisors is based on an algorithm of qualitative criteria, mostly gained through telephone and in-person due diligence interviews, and quantitative data. Those advisors that are considered have a minimum of seven years experience, and the algorithm weights factors like revenue trends, assets under management, compliance records, industry experience and those that encompass best practices in their practices and approach to working with clients. Portfolio performance is not a criteria due to varying client objectives and lack of audited data. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

2019

Forbes/SHOOK Top Wealth Advisors Best-In State (2/20/19). Data as of 6/30/18. The Forbes ranking of Best-In-State Wealth Advisors is based on an algorithm of qualitative criteria, mostly gained through telephone and in-person due diligence interviews, and quantitative data. Those advisors that are considered have a minimum of seven years experience, and the algorithm weights factors like revenue trends, assets under management, compliance records, industry experience and those that encompass best practices in their practices and approach to working with clients. Portfolio performance is not a criteria due to varying client objectives and lack of audited data.  Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

2018

Forbes/SHOOK Top Wealth Advisors Best-In State (2/15/18). Data as of 6/30/17. The Forbes ranking of Best-In-State Wealth Advisors is based on an algorithm of qualitative criteria, mostly gained through telephone and in-person due diligence interviews, and quantitative data. Those advisors that are considered have a minimum of seven years experience, and the algorithm weights factors like revenue trends, assets under management, compliance records, industry experience and those that encompass best practices in their practices and approach to working with clients. Portfolio performance is not a criteria due to varying client objectives and lack of audited data. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

Forbes/SHOOK Top Women Wealth Advisors

2023

Forbes/SHOOK Top Women Wealth Advisors (2/1/23). Data as of 9/30/22. The Forbes ranking of America’s Top Women Wealth Advisors ranking is based on in-person, virtual and telephone due diligence meetings to evaluate each advisor qualitatively, a major component of a ranking algorithm that includes: client impact, industry experience, review of best practices and compliance records, firm nominations; and quantitative criteria, including: assets under management and revenue generated for their firms. Investment performance is not a criterion because client objectives and risk tolerances vary, and advisors rarely have audited performance reports. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

2022

Forbes/SHOOK Top Women Wealth Advisors (2/4/22). Data as of 9/30/21. The Forbes ranking of America’s Top Women Wealth Advisors and Top Women Wealth Advisors Best-In-State is based on an algorithm of qualitative data, learned through surveys and interviews conducting in-person, by telephone and virtually to evaluate best practices, level of service, investing models and compliance records as well as quantitative data, such as revenue trends and assets under management. All advisors have a minimum of seven years’ experience. Portfolio performance is not a criteria due to varying client objectives and lack of audited data. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

2021

Forbes/SHOOK Top Women Wealth Advisors (3/24/21). Data as of 9/30/20. The Forbes ranking of America’s Top Women Wealth Advisors is based on an algorithm of qualitative data, learned through surveys and interviews (in-person, telephone and virtual), so we can evaluate best practices, service and investing models, compliance records, etc.; as well as quantitative data, like revenue trends and assets under management. All advisors have a minimum of seven years’ experience. Portfolio performance is not a criteria due to varying client objectives and lack of audited data. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

2020

Forbes/SHOOK Top Women Wealth Advisors (4/21/20). Data as of 9/30/19. The Forbes ranking of America’s Top Women Wealth Advisors is based on an algorithm of qualitative data, such as telephone and in-person interviews, a review of best practices, service and investing models, and compliance records; as well as quantitative data, like revenue trends and assets under management. All advisors have a minimum of seven years’ experience. Portfolio performance is not a criteria due to varying client objectives and lack of audited data.

2019

Forbes/SHOOK Top Women Wealth Advisors (4/30/19). Data as of 9/30/18. The Forbes ranking of America’s Top Women Wealth Advisors is based on an algorithm of qualitative and quantitative data, rating thousands of wealth advisors with a minimum of seven years of experience and weighing factors like revenue trends, assets under management, compliance records, industry experience and best practices learned through telephone and in-person interviews. Portfolio performance is not a criteria due to varying client objectives and lack of audited data. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced. 

2018

Forbes/SHOOK Top Women Wealth Advisors (5/1/18). Data as of 9/30/17. The Forbes ranking of America’s Top Women Wealth Advisors is based on an algorithm of qualitative and quantitative data, rating thousands of wealth advisors with a minimum of seven years of experience and weighing factors like revenue trends, assets under management, compliance records, industry experience and best practices learned through telephone and in-person interviews. Portfolio performance is not a criteria due to varying client objectives and lack of audited data. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced. 

2017

Forbes/SHOOK Top Women Wealth Advisors (2/28/17). Data as of 9/30/16. The Forbes ranking of America’s Top Women Wealth Advisors is based on an algorithm of qualitative and quantitative data, rating thousands of wealth advisors with a minimum of seven years of experience and weighing factors like revenue trends, assets under management, compliance records, industry experience and best practices learned through telephone and in-person interviews. Portfolio performance is not a criteria due to varying client objectives and lack of audited data. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

Forbes/SHOOK Top Women Wealth Advisors Best-In-State

2023

Forbes/SHOOK Top Women Wealth Advisors Best-In-State (2/1/23). Data as of 9/30/22. The Forbes ranking of Top Women Wealth Advisors Best-In-State is based on in-person, virtual and telephone due diligence meetings to evaluate each advisor qualitatively, a major component of a ranking algorithm that includes: client impact, industry experience, review of best practices and compliance records, firm nominations; and quantitative criteria, including: assets under management and revenue generated for their firms. Investment performance is not a criterion because client objectives and risk tolerances vary, and advisors rarely have audited performance reports. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

2022

Forbes/SHOOK Top Women Wealth Advisors Best-In-State (2/4/22). Data as of 9/30/21. The Forbes ranking of Top Women Wealth Advisors Best-In-State is based on an algorithm of qualitative data, learned through surveys and interviews conducting in-person, by telephone and virtually to evaluate best practices, level of service, investing models and compliance records as well as quantitative data, such as revenue trends and assets under management. All advisors have a minimum of seven years’ experience. Portfolio performance is not a criteria due to varying client objectives and lack of audited data.Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

2021

Forbes/SHOOK Top Women Wealth Advisors Best-In-State (3/24/21). Data as of 9/30/20. The Forbes ranking of Top Women Wealth Advisors Best-In-State is based on an algorithm of: qualitative data, learned through surveys and interviews (in-person, telephone and virtual), so we can evaluate best practices, service and investing models, compliance records, etc.; as well as quantitative data, like revenue trends and assets under management. All advisors have a minimum of seven years’ experience. Portfolio performance is not a criteria due to varying client objectives and lack of audited data.Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

2020

Forbes/SHOOK Top Women Wealth Advisors Best-In-State (4/21/20). Data as of 9/30/19. The Forbes ranking of Top Women Wealth Advisors Best-In-State is based on an algorithm of: qualitative data, such as telephone and in-person interviews, a review of best practices, service and investing models, and compliance records; as well as quantitative data, like revenue trends and assets under management. All advisors have a minimum of seven years’ experience. Portfolio performance is not a criteria due to varying client objectives and lack of audited data. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

2019

Forbes/SHOOK Top Women Wealth Advisors Best-In-State (4/30/19). Data as of 9/30/18. TThe Forbes ranking of Top Women Wealth Advisors Best-In-State is based on an algorithm of qualitative and quantitative data, rating thousands of wealth advisors with a minimum of seven years of experience and weighing factors like revenue trends, assets under management, compliance records, industry experience and best practices learned through telephone and in-person interviews. Portfolio performance is not a criteria due to varying client objectives and lack of audited data. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

2018

Forbes/SHOOK Top Women Wealth Advisors Best-In-State (5/1/18). Data as of 9/30/17. The Forbes ranking of Top Women Wealth Advisors Best-In-State is based on an algorithm of qualitative and quantitative data, rating thousands of wealth advisors with a minimum of seven years of experience and weighing factors like revenue trends, assets under management, compliance records, industry experience and best practices learned through telephone and in-person interviews. Portfolio performance is not a criteria due to varying client objectives and lack of audited data. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

2017

Forbes/SHOOK Top Women Wealth Advisors Best-In-State (2/28/17). Data as of 9/30/16. The Forbes ranking of Top Women Wealth Advisors Best-In-State is based on an algorithm of qualitative and quantitative data, rating thousands of wealth advisors with a minimum of seven years of experience and weighing factors like revenue trends, assets under management, compliance records, industry experience and best practices learned through telephone and in-person interviews. Portfolio performance is not a criteria due to varying client objectives and lack of audited data.Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced. 

Forbes/SHOOK Top Next-Gen Wealth Advisors

2022

Forbes/SHOOK Top Next-Gen Wealth Advisors (8/3/22). Data as of 3/31/22. The Forbes Next-Gen Wealth Advisors rankings is based on an algorithm of qualitative criterion—mostly gained through telephone and in-person due diligence interviews—and quantitative data. Those advisors that are considered have a minimum of four years' experience, and the algorithm weighs factors like revenue trends, assets under management, compliance records, industry experience and those that encompass the highest standards of best practices. Portfolio performance is not a criterion due to varying client objectives and lack of audited data.  Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

2021

Forbes/SHOOK Top Next-Gen Wealth Advisors (9/21/22). Data as of 3/31/21. The Forbes Next-Gen Wealth Advisors rankings is based on an algorithm of qualitative criterion, mostly gained through telephone and in-person due diligence interviews, and quantitative data. Those advisors that are considered have a minimum of four years' experience, and the algorithm weighs factors like revenue trends, assets under management, compliance records, industry experience and those that encompass the highest standards of best practices. Portfolio performance is not a criterion due to varying client objectives and lack of audited data. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced. 

2020

Forbes/SHOOK Top Next-Gen Wealth Advisors (7/22/20). Data as of 3/31/20. The Forbes Next-Gen Wealth Advisors rankings is based on an algorithm of qualitative criterion, mostly gained through telephone and in-person due diligence interviews, and quantitative data. Those advisors that are considered have a minimum of four years' experience, and the algorithm weighs factors like revenue trends, assets under management, compliance records, industry experience and those that encompass the highest standards of best practices. Portfolio performance is not a criterion due to varying client objectives and lack of audited data. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced. 

2019

Forbes/SHOOK Top Next-Gen Wealth Advisors (6/25/19). Data as of 3/31/19. The Forbes Next-Gen Wealth Advisors rankings is based on an algorithm of qualitative criterion, mostly gained through telephone and in-person due diligence interviews, and quantitative data. Those advisors that are considered have a minimum of four years' experience, and the algorithm weighs factors like revenue trends, assets under management, compliance records, industry experience and those that encompass the highest standards of best practices. Portfolio performance is not a criterion due to varying client objectives and lack of audited data. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced. 

2018

Forbes/SHOOK Top Next-Gen Wealth Advisors (7/25/18). Data as of 3/31/18. The Forbes Next-Gen Wealth Advisors rankings is based on an algorithm of qualitative criterion, mostly gained through telephone and in-person due diligence interviews, and quantitative data. Those advisors that are considered have a minimum of four years' experience, and the algorithm weighs factors like revenue trends, assets under management, compliance records, industry experience and those that encompass the highest standards of best practices. Portfolio performance is not a criterion due to varying client objectives and lack of audited data. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced. 

2017

Forbes/SHOOK Top Next-Gen Wealth Advisors (7/25/17). Data as of 3/31/17. The Forbes Next-Gen Wealth Advisors rankings is based on an algorithm of qualitative criterion, mostly gained through telephone and in-person due diligence interviews, and quantitative data. Those advisors that are considered have a minimum of four years' experience, and the algorithm weighs factors like revenue trends, assets under management, compliance records, industry experience and those that encompass the highest standards of best practices. Portfolio performance is not a criterion due to varying client objectives and lack of audited data. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced. 

Forbes/SHOOK Top Next-Gen Wealth Advisors Best-In-State

2022

Forbes/SHOOK Top Next-Gen Wealth Advisors Best-In-State (8/3/22). Data as of 3/31/22. The Forbes Next-Gen Wealth Advisors rankings is based on an algorithm of qualitative criterion—mostly gained through telephone and in-person due diligence interviews—and quantitative data. Those advisors that are considered have a minimum of four years' experience, and the algorithm weighs factors like revenue trends, assets under management, compliance records, industry experience and those that encompass the highest standards of best practices. Portfolio performance is not a criterion due to varying client objectives and lack of audited data.  Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

2021

Forbes/SHOOK Top Next-Gen Wealth Advisors Best-In-State. The Forbes Next-Gen Wealth Advisors rankings is based on an algorithm of qualitative criterion, mostly gained through telephone and in-person due diligence interviews, and quantitative data. Those advisors that are considered have a minimum of four years' experience, and the algorithm weighs factors like revenue trends, assets under management, compliance records, industry experience and those that encompass the highest standards of best practices. Portfolio performance is not a criterion due to varying client objectives and lack of audited data.Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced. 

2020

Forbes/SHOOK Top Next-Gen Wealth Advisors Best-In-State (7/22/20). Data as of 3/31/20. The Forbes Next-Gen Wealth Advisors rankings is based on an algorithm of qualitative criterion, mostly gained through telephone and in-person due diligence interviews, and quantitative data. Those advisors that are considered have a minimum of four years' experience, and the algorithm weighs factors like revenue trends, assets under management, compliance records, industry experience and those that encompass the highest standards of best practices. Portfolio performance is not a criterion due to varying client objectives and lack of audited data. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced. 

2019

Forbes/SHOOK Top Next-Gen Wealth Advisors Best-In-State (6/25/19). Data as of 3/31/19. The Forbes Next-Gen Wealth Advisors rankings is based on an algorithm of qualitative criterion, mostly gained through telephone and in-person due diligence interviews, and quantitative data. Those advisors that are considered have a minimum of four years' experience, and the algorithm weighs factors like revenue trends, assets under management, compliance records, industry experience and those that encompass the highest standards of best practices. Portfolio performance is not a criterion due to varying client objectives and lack of audited data. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced. 

2018

Forbes/SHOOK Top Next-Gen Wealth Advisors Best-In-State (7/25/18). Data as of 3/31/18. The Forbes Next-Gen Wealth Advisors rankings is based on an algorithm of qualitative criterion, mostly gained through telephone and in-person due diligence interviews, and quantitative data. Those advisors that are considered have a minimum of four years' experience, and the algorithm weighs factors like revenue trends, assets under management, compliance records, industry experience and those that encompass the highest standards of best practices. Portfolio performance is not a criterion due to varying client objectives and lack of audited data. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced. 

2017

Forbes/SHOOK Top Next-Gen Wealth Advisors Best-In-State (7/25/17). Data as of 3/31/17. The Forbes Next-Gen Wealth Advisors rankings is based on an algorithm of qualitative criterion, mostly gained through telephone and in-person due diligence interviews, and quantitative data. Those advisors that are considered have a minimum of four years' experience, and the algorithm weighs factors like revenue trends, assets under management, compliance records, industry experience and those that encompass the highest standards of best practices. Portfolio performance is not a criterion due to varying client objectives and lack of audited data. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

Working Mother/SHOOK Top Wealth Advisor Moms

2021

Working Mother/SHOOK Top Wealth Advisor Moms (10/12/21). Data as of 3/31/21. SHOOK™ Research considered women advisors with children living at home under 21 years old. Ranking algorithm is based on qualitative measures derived from telephone and in-person interviews and surveys: service models, investing process, client retention, industry experience, review of compliance records, firm nominations, etc.; and quantitative criteria, such as assets under management and revenue generated for their firms. Investment performance is not a criteria because client objectives and risk tolerances vary, and advisors rarely have audited performance reports. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

2020

Working Mother/SHOOK Top Wealth Advisor Moms (9/21/20). Data as of 3/31/20. SHOOK™ Research considered women advisors with children living at home under 21 years old. Ranking algorithm is based on qualitative measures derived from telephone and in-person interviews and surveys: service models, investing process, client retention, industry experience, review of compliance records, firm nominations, etc.; and quantitative criteria, such as assets under management and revenue generated for their firms. Investment performance is not a criteria because client objectives and risk tolerances vary, and advisors rarely have audited performance reports. Rankings are based on the opinions of SHOOK Research, LLC. Past performance is not an indication of future results.  Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

2019

Working Mother/SHOOK Top Wealth Advisor Moms (10/2/19). Data as of 3/31/19. SHOOK™ Research considered women advisors with children living at home under 21 years old. Ranking algorithm is based on qualitative measures derived from telephone and in-person interviews and surveys: service models, investing process, client retention, industry experience, review of compliance records, firm nominations, etc.; and quantitative criteria, such as assets under management and revenue generated for their firms. Investment performance is not a criteria because client objectives and risk tolerances vary, and advisors rarely have audited performance reports. Rankings are based on the opinions of SHOOK Research, LLC. Past performance is not an indication of future results.  Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

2018

Working Mother/SHOOK Top Wealth Advisor Moms (10/8/18). Data as of 3/31/18. SHOOK™ Research considered women advisors with children living at home under 21 years old. Ranking algorithm is based on qualitative measures derived from telephone and in-person interviews and surveys: service models, investing process, client retention, industry experience, review of compliance records, firm nominations, etc.; and quantitative criteria, such as assets under management and revenue generated for their firms. Investment performance is not a criteria because client objectives and risk tolerances vary, and advisors rarely have audited performance reports. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

2017

Working Mother/SHOOK Top Wealth Advisor Moms (10/3/17). Data as of 3/31/17. SHOOK™ Research considered women advisors with children living at home under 21 years old. Ranking algorithm is based on qualitative measures derived from telephone and in-person interviews and surveys: service models, investing process, client retention, industry experience, review of compliance records, firm nominations, etc.; and quantitative criteria, such as assets under management and revenue generated for their firms. Investment performance is not a criteria because client objectives and risk tolerances vary, and advisors rarely have audited performance reports. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

Barron’s Top 100 Financial Advisors

2023

Barron’s Top 100 Financial Advisors (4/14/23). Data as of 12/31/22. Barron's ranks the top financial advisors based on assets under management, revenues generated by the advisors for their firms, and the quality of advisors' practices. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

2022

Barron’s Top 100 Financial Advisors (4/15/22). Data as of 12/31/21. Barron's ranks the top financial advisors based on assets under management, revenues generated by the advisors for their firms, and the quality of advisors' practices. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

2021

Barron’s Top 100 Financial Advisors (4/16/21). Data as of 12/31/20. Barron's ranks the top financial advisors based on assets under management, revenues generated by the advisors for their firms, and the quality of advisors' practices. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced

2020

Barron’s Top 100 Financial Advisors (4/20/20). Data as of 12/31/19. Barron's ranks the top financial advisors based on assets under management, revenues generated by the advisors for their firms, and the quality of advisors' practices. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

2019

Barron’s Top 100 Financial Advisors (4/22/19). Data as of 12/31/18. Barron's ranks the top financial advisors based on assets under management, revenues generated by the advisors for their firms, and the quality of advisors' practices. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

2018

Barron’s Top 100 Financial Advisors (4/21/18). Data as of 12/31/17. Barron's ranks the top financial advisors based on assets under management, revenues generated by the advisors for their firms, and the quality of advisors' practices. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

2017

Barron’s Top 100 Financial Advisors (4/15/17). Data as of 12/31/16. Barron's ranks the top financial advisors based on assets under management, revenues generated by the advisors for their firms, and the quality of advisors' practices. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

2016

Barron’s Top 100 Financial Advisors (4/16/16). Data as of 12/31/2015. Barron's ranks the top financial advisors based on assets under management, revenues generated by the advisors for their firms, and the quality of advisors' practices. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

Barron's Top 100 Women Financial Advisors

2022

Barron’s Top Women Financial Advisors (6/17/22). Data as of 3/31/22. Barron's ranks the top women financial advisors based on assets under management, revenues generated by the advisors for their firms, and the quality of advisors' practices. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

2021

Barron’s Top Women Financial Advisors (6/18/21). Data as of 3/31/21. Barron's ranks the top women financial advisors based on assets under management, revenues generated by the advisors for their firms, and the quality of advisors' practices. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

2020

Barron’s Top Women Financial Advisors (7/17/20). Data as of 3/31/20. Barron's ranks the top women financial advisors based on assets under management, revenues generated by the advisors for their firms, and the quality of advisors' practices. Fee paid to publication for advertisement materials after rating announced.

2019

Barron’s Top Women Financial Advisors (6/7/19). Data as of 3/31/19. Barron's ranks the top women financial advisors based on assets under management, revenues generated by the advisors for their firms, and the quality of advisors' practices. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

2018

Barron’s Top Women Financial Advisors (6/8/18). Data as of 3/31/18. Barron's ranks the top women financial advisors based on assets under management, revenues generated by the advisors for their firms, and the quality of advisors' practices. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

2017

Barron’s Top Women Financial Advisors (6/15/17). Data as of 3/31/17. Barron's ranks the top women financial advisors based on assets under management, revenues generated by the advisors for their firms, and the quality of advisors' practices. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

2016

Barron’s Top Women Financial Advisors (6/4/16). Data as of 3/31/16. Barron's ranks the top women financial advisors based on assets under management, revenues generated by the advisors for their firms, and the quality of advisors' practices. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced

Barron's Top 1,200 Advisors

2023

Barron’s Top 1,200 U.S. Financial Advisors (3/10/23). Data as of 9/30/22. Barron's ranks the top 1,200 U.S. financial advisors based on assets under management, revenues generated by the advisors for their firms, and the quality of advisors' practices. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced

2022

Barron’s Top 1,200 U.S. Financial Advisors (3/11/22). Data as of 9/30/21. Barron's ranks the top 1,200 U.S. financial advisors based on assets under management, revenues generated by the advisors for their firms, and the quality of advisors' practices. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

2021

Barron’s Top 1,200 U.S. Financial Advisors (3/12/21). Data as of 9/30/20. Barron's ranks the top 1,200 U.S. financial advisors based on assets under management, revenues generated by the advisors for their firms, and the quality of advisors' practices. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

2020

Barron’s Top 1,200 U.S. Financial Advisors (3/13/20). Data as of 9/30/19. Barron's ranks the top 1,200 U.S. financial advisors based on assets under management, revenues generated by the advisors for their firms, and the quality of advisors' practices. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

2019

Barron’s Top 1,200 U.S. Financial Advisors (3/8/19). Data as of 9/30/18. Barron's ranks the top 1,200 U.S. financial advisors based on assets under management, revenues generated by the advisors for their firms, and the quality of advisors' practices. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

2018

Barron’s Top 1,200 U.S. Financial Advisors (3/8/18). Data as of 9/30/17. Barron's ranks the top 1,200 U.S. financial advisors based on assets under management, revenues generated by the advisors for their firms, and the quality of advisors' practices. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

2017

Barron’s Top 1,200 U.S. Financial Advisors (3/15/17). Data as of 9/30/16. Barron's ranks the top 1,200 U.S. financial advisors based on assets under management, revenues generated by the advisors for their firms, and the quality of advisors' practices. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced

2016

Barron’s Top 1,200 U.S. Financial Advisors (3/5/16). Data as of 9/30/2015. Barron's ranks the top 1,200 U.S. financial advisors based on assets under management, revenues generated by the advisors for their firms, and the quality of advisors' practices. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

Barron's Top 100 Private Wealth Management Teams

2022

Barron’s Top 100 Private Wealth Management Teams (4/15/22). Data as of 12/31/21. Barron's ranks the top 100 private wealth management teams based on assets under management, revenues generated by the advisors for their firms, and the quality of advisors' practices. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

2021

Barron’s Top 100 Private Wealth Management Teams (4/16/21). Data as of 12/31/20. Barron's ranks the top 100 private wealth management teams based on assets under management, revenues generated by the advisors for their firms, and the quality of advisors' practices. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

2020

Barron’s Top 100 Private Wealth Management Teams (4/20/20). Data as of 12/31/19. Barron's ranks the top 100 private wealth management teams based on assets under management, revenues generated by the advisors for their firms, and the quality of advisors' practices. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

2019

Barron’s Top 100 Private Wealth Management Teams (4/22/19). Data as of 12/31/18. Barron's ranks the top 100 private wealth management teams based on assets under management, revenues generated by the advisors for their firms, and the quality of advisors' practices. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced

Barron's Top 50 Private Wealth Management Teams

2020

Barron’s Top 50 Private Wealth Management Teams (4/20/20). Data as of 12/31/19. Barron’s ranks the top 50 private wealth management teams based on size, shape, regulatory records and credentials of their members and the resources they have to serve their clients. The teams listed specialize in managing wealth on behalf of individuals and families. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

2019

Barron’s Top 50 Private Wealth Management Teams (4/22/19). Data as of 12/31/18. Barron’s ranks the top 50 private wealth management teams based on size, shape, regulatory records and credentials of their members and the resources they have to serve their clients. The teams listed specialize in managing wealth on behalf of individuals and families. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

Financial Planning 40 Under 40

2023

Financial Planning Top 40 Under 40 (2/1/23). Data as of 9/30/22. Nominees for the rankings were 39 or younger as of Dec. 31, 2022, and were registered with a wealth management firm in the employee channel. FP uses production totals that are verified by each broker's employer to determine the rankings. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

2022

Financial Planning Top 40 Under 40 (2/1/22). Data as of 9/30/21. Nominees for the rankings were 39 or younger as of Dec. 31, 2021, and were registered with a wealth management firm in the employee channel. FP uses production totals that are verified by each broker's employer to determine the rankings. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

2021

Financial Planning Top 40 Under 40 (1/25/21-1/26/21). Data as of 9/30/20. Nominees for the rankings were 39 or younger as of Dec. 31, 2021, and were registered with a wealth management firm in the employee channel. FP uses production totals that are verified by each broker's employer to determine the rankings. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

NAPA Top DC Advisor Teams

2021

National Association of Plan Advisors (NAPA) Top DC Advisor Teams (3/22/22). Data as of 12/31/21. The NAPA Top DC Advisor Team list highlights the nation’s leading retirement plan advisor firms. The list focuses on teams, broadly defined as being in a single physical location, and having at least $100 million in DC assets under advisement. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

2020

National Association of Plan Advisors (NAPA) Top DC Advisor Teams (3/15/21). Data as of 12/31/20. The NAPA Top DC Advisor Team list highlights the nation’s leading retirement plan advisor firms. The list focuses on teams, broadly defined as being in a single physical location, and having at least $100 million in DC assets under advisement. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

Financial Advisor IQ Leadership Council

2021

Financial Advisor IQ Leadership Council (11/22/21). Data as of 7/21. To qualify, advisors must manage or advise on at least $50 million in assets, have three or more years of experience as a financial advisor/broker, maintain an excellent compliance record, and express a desire to engage with industry issues. Ratings may not guarantee future success or results. Fee paid to rating provider for advertisement materials after rating announced.

IMPORTANT INFORMATION

Securities-based lines of credit are extended at the discretion of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“Chase Bank”) and Chase Bank has no commitment to extend a line of credit or make loans available to you under a line of credit. Any loan extended under a securities-based line of credit is subject to credit approval by Chase Bank and, if approved, the terms and conditions contained in definitive loan documentation governing the line of credit. Proceeds from a securities-based line of credit cannot be used to purchase, carry or trade securities. A line of credit collateralized by the securities in your investment account(s) involves certain risks and may not be suitable for all borrowers. Chase Bank assigns values to these securities and, at any time and without notice to you, may increase or decrease these values or change the eligibility of these securities as collateral. A decline in the value of these securities collateralizing your securities-based line of credit (whether due to a market downturn, market volatility or otherwise) directly impacts the amount of credit available to you and may require you to provide additional collateral and/or pay down your line of credit in order to avoid the forced sale of these securities by Chase Bank. The securities in your account may be sold to meet a collateral shortfall, and Chase Bank may sell your securities without contacting you. Some or all of the securities sold to meet a collateral shortfall may be sold at prices higher than their initial cost, which may result in adverse tax consequences. You should consult your tax advisor to fully understand the tax implications associated with pledging securities in connection with a loan. Please review these and other risks in more detail with your advisor, and make sure to read your line of credit documentation carefully so that you fully understand your obligations and the risks associated with this opportunity. An exercise of remedies by Chase Bank in connection with your securities-based line of credit may a ect the performance of your investment management or investment advisory account(s), and may cause such accounts to no longer conform to applicable investment guidelines. When selling securities, Chase Bank is not required to act in accordance with any fiduciary duty Chase Bank and its a liates might otherwise have as your investment manager or investment advisor. It is important to note that Chase Bank and its a liates may earn more if you borrow against your securities and other assets rather than liquidate assets to meet your cash needs. The Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”) is a broad measure of the cost of borrowing cash overnight collateralized by U.S. Treasury securities. The SOFR is published by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and is determined based on certain transactions in the U.S. dollar Treasury repo market. Since the SOFR is an overnight rate, it is published every Banking Day, but is e ective for the Banking Day prior to the date of publication. Refer to your definitive loan documentation for a definition of “Banking Day.” Because the SOFR is administered by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, the Bank has no control over its determination, calculation or publication, and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York may alter the methods of calculation, publication schedule, rate revision practices or availability of the SOFR at any time without notice. The SOFR is a floating interest rate option, and changes in the SOFR can lead to a higher or lower cost of borrowing.

 

Check the background of Our Firm and Investment Professionals on FINRA's BrokerCheck

To learn more about J. P. Morgan’s investment business, including our accounts, products and services, as well as our relationship with you, please review our  J.P. Morgan Securities LLC Form CRS and  Guide to Investment Services and Brokerage Products.

This website is for informational purposes only, and not an offer, recommendation or solicitation of any product, strategy service or transaction. Any views, strategies or products discussed on this site may not be appropriate or suitable for all individuals and are subject to risks. Prior to making any investment or financial decisions, an investor should seek individualized advice from a personal financial, legal, tax and other professional advisors that take into account all of the particular facts and circumstances of an investor's own situation. 

This website provides information about the brokerage and investment advisory services provided by J.P. Morgan Securities LLC (JPMS). When JPMS acts as a broker-dealer, a client's relationship with us and our duties to the client will be different in some important ways than a client's relationship with us and our duties to the client when we are acting as an investment advisor. A client should carefully read the agreements and disclosures received (including our Form ADV disclosure brochure, if and when applicable) in connection with our provision of services for important information about the capacity in which we will be acting.

INVESTMENT AND INSURANCE PRODUCTS ARE: • NOT FDIC INSURED • NOT INSURED BY ANY FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AGENCY • NOT A DEPOSIT OR OTHER OBLIGATION OF, OR GUARANTEED BY, JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. OR ANY OF ITS AFFILIATES • SUBJECT TO INVESTMENT RISKS, INCLUDING POSSIBLE LOSS OF THE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT INVESTED

Equal Housing Opportunity logo

J.P. Morgan Chase Bank N.A., Member FDIC. Not a commitment to lend. All extensions of credit are subject to credit approval.

Investments in alternative investment strategies is speculative, often involves a greater degree of risk than traditional investments including limited liquidity and limited transparency, among other factors and should only be considered by sophisticated investors with the financial capability to accept the loss of all or part of the assets devoted to such strategies.

Borrowing with securities as collateral involves certain risks, including the possibility that you may need to deposit additional securities and/or cash in the account to meet a maintenance call, and that securities in the account may be sold to meet the maintenance call.  Proper management of your account and a thorough understanding of the conditions that may affect your investments will assist you in effectively using the margin lending program.​

J.P. Morgan Wealth Management is a business of JPMorgan Chase & Co., which offers investment products and services through J.P. Morgan Securities LLC (JPMS), a registered broker-dealer and investment adviser, member FINRA and SIPC. Insurance products are made available through Chase Insurance Agency, Inc. (CIA), a licensed insurance agency, doing business as Chase Insurance Agency Services, Inc. in Florida. Certain custody and other services are provided by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (JPMCB). JPMS, CIA and JPMCB are affiliated companies under the common control of JPMorgan Chase & Co. Products not available in all states.

Please read additional Important Information in conjunction with these pages.