1. Codify Use of Return Reason Code R17 (Rule #03 – Effective October 1, 2024)
Current:
- There currently is no defined Return Reason Code to return an entry as suspected fraudulent or “QUESTIONABLE”
- Unauthorized reasons are based on a customer, dispute or claim
- The Rules provide for using the return code that most closely approximates the reason for the return
- Nacha guidance has been that R17 is likely the closest return code for incidents of potential fraud
- The word can continue to be used for high volume of invalid account number entries
Amendment as per Nacha:
- Clarifies that R17 “QUESTIONABLE” must be use by the RDFI to return an ACH entry that is suspected fraudulent
- This rule will explicitly allow, but not require, an RDFI to use R17 to return an entry that it thinks is fraudulent. Such use is optional and at the discretion of the RDFI
- The rule retains the current requirement to include the descriptor QUESTIONABLE in the return addenda record for such use
- The amendment is intended to improve the recovery of funds originated due to fraud
For more details, please refer to the Nacha website.
2. Expanded Use of ODFI Request for Return/R06 (Rule #04 – Implementation extended to April 1, 2025)
Change Brief:
- Expands the permissible uses of the Request for Return to allow an ODFI to request a return from the RDFI for any reason
- RDFI has 10 business days to respond to the ODFI after receipt
Amendment as per Nacha:
- This rule will expand the permissible uses of the Request for Return to allow an ODFI to request a return from the RDFI for any reason
- The ODFI would still indemnify the RDFI for compliance with the request
- Compliance by the RDFI would remain optional.
- An RDFI’s only obligation to the ODFI would be to respond to the ODFI’s request
- Regardless of whether the RDFI complies with the ODFI’s request to return the Entry, the RDFI must advise the ODFI of its decision or the status of the request within ten (10) banking days of receipt of the ODFI’s request
- This rule is intended to improve the recovery of funds when fraud has occurred.
For more details, please refer to the Nacha website.
3. Additional Funds Availability Exceptions (Rule #05 – Effective October 1, 2024)
Current:
- Currently, the Nacha Rules provide RDFIs with an exemption from funds availability requirements if the RDFI reasonably suspects the credit entry was unauthorized
- This exemption encompasses cases of account takeovers, in which a party that is not the Originator is able to initiate an ACH credit from the Originator’s account
Amendment as per Nacha:
- Expands current RDFI exemption from funds availability requirements to include credits suspected are originated as part of a fraud scheme or event
- RDFI must make “reasonable efforts” to contact the ODFI to advise the delay
For more details, please refer to the Nacha website.
4. Timing of Written Statement of Unauthorized Debit (WSUD) (Rule #08 – Effective October 1, 2024)
Current:
- The current Rules require that the Written Statement of Unauthorized Debit (WSUD) be dated on or after the Settlement Date of the Entry
Amendment as per Nacha:
- This rule will allow a WSUD to be signed and dated by the Receiver on or after the date on which the Entry is presented to the Receiver (either by posting to the account or by notice of a pending transaction), even if the debit has not yet been posted to the account
- Allow a consumer Receiver’s Written Statement of Unauthorized Debit to be completed on the date an ACH debit is presented
For more details, please refer to the Nacha website.
5. RDFI Must Promptly Return Unauthorized Debit (Rule #09 – Effective October 1, 2024)
Current:
- Defines “promptly” that an RDFI return an unauthorized debit by the 6th banking after receipt and completion of the WSUD process
- The rule includes new language to set the return deadline to the opening of business of the 6th Banking Days after the RDFI completes its review of the Receiver’s signed WSUD (new language underlined):
- “the RDFI Transmits the Extended Return Entry to its ACH Operator by its deposit deadline for the Extended Return Entry to be made available to the ODFI no later than the opening of business on the sixth Banking Day after the Banking Day on which the RDFI completes its review of the Receiver’s signed Written Statement of Unauthorized Debit, but in no case later than the opening of business on the Banking Day following the sixtieth calendar day following the Settlement Date of the original Entry.”
Amendment as per Nacha:
- This amendment will require that when returning a consumer debit as unauthorized in the extended return timeframe, the RDFI must do so by the opening of the sixth Banking Day following the completion of its review of the consumer’s signed WSUD
- The amendment is intended to improve the recovery of funds and reduce the incidence of future fraud
- The prompt return of an unauthorized debit alerts an ODFI and an Originator to a potential problem
- This is also true in first-party fraud schemes in which the party who disputes the debit Entry is the same party who benefits from the original entry
- A prompt return supports controls that an Originator may have enabled, such as a hold on funds or delayed shipment of merchandise
- This amendment will not change reasons or requirements for obtaining a Written Statement of Unauthorized Debit
For more details, please refer to the Nacha website.