Key takeaways

  • Dominance in Cross-Border Fund Distribution: Luxembourg and Ireland are the leading European domiciles for cross-border funds, holding a combined 91% of global assets under management (AUM) for such funds.
  • Regulatory and Operational Expertise: Both countries have created thriving ecosystems for complex funds thanks to their expertise in legal fund structures, tax treaty networks, and early adoption of the Undertakings for Collective Investments in Transferable Securities (UCITS) Directive.
  • Growth in ELTIFs: Luxembourg is the domicile with the most European Long-Term Investments Funds (ELTIFs), but Ireland is trying to make inroads. Both countries also have a bevy of other private asset funds that are attractive growth vehicles for retail capital, including UCI Part II Funds in Luxembourg and Investment Limited Partnerships (ILPs) in Ireland.
  • ETF Market Leadership: Ireland is the dominant domicile for ETFs in Europe, with 78% of European ETFs domiciled there. Luxembourg, while second, is strategically positioning itself to capitalize on the growing trend of active ETFs.

Luxembourg and Ireland are far and away the most sought-after European domiciles for cross-border funds. Their combined domicile share of total assets under management (AUM) globally for cross-border funds is 91% — with Luxembourg’s proportion at a more commanding 48% compared to Ireland’s 43%, per an April 2025 report from the Association of the Luxembourg Fund Industry (ALFI).1

The dominance of Luxembourg and Ireland as cross-border fund domiciles is attributable to their first-mover advantage in the cross-border funds realm, including early adoption of the Undertakings for Collective Investments in Transferable Securities (UCITS) Directive in 1988. The two nations have since expanded their expertise and operational infrastructure in developing legal fund structures and tax treaty networks.

As regulatory changes allow for wider swaths of retail investors in Europe to enter more fund structures and as hunger grows for more complex funds with private assets, savvy asset managers would do well to examine whether Luxembourg or Ireland would best serve as a hospitable domicile for their funds.

Private asset funds

Luxembourg and Ireland are widely recognized for their expertise in establishing and servicing a diverse array of funds, including increasingly popular fund structures that support private assets. In particular, Luxembourg’s dominance as a cross-border fund domicile for private asset funds stems from its strong regulatory environment and tax ecosystem that are conducive to international fund distribution.

From 2010 to 2022, Luxembourg secured its place as the main domicile for alternative funds in Europe by boosting its share of European alternative assets from 15.6% to 61.8%.2

ELTIFs

Though there are other fund structures in both Luxembourg and Ireland that may prove attractive to asset managers, there is a particularly important opportunity in European Long-Term Investments Funds (ELTIFs), regulated, collective investment vehicles that facilitate the ability for investors, including retail investors, to put capital into long-term investment opportunities for unlisted assets such as private equity and debt, along with infrastructure projects.

Regulatory changes can, in part, explain the exponential growth since their emergence in 2015. To counter adoption hurdles and facilitate the flow of capital into ELTIFs, the ELTIF 2.0 Regulation, effective January 2024, ushered in simplified marketing rules to remove access barriers for retail investors and provide investment managers with enhanced flexibility regarding investment rules.3

As part of the EU’s initiative to channel retail capital into long-term social and infrastructure projects, ELTIF 2.0 also expanded the definition of real assets to include immovable properties like highways and infrastructure projects such as hospitals.4

Luxembourg is leading the charge as a domicile for ELTIFs and other private asset funds because of its early adoption of certain rule sets; high regulatory expertise on complex structures from legal, tax, and financial professions5; and elevated regulatory protection levels. Luxembourg’s political and economic stability also makes it a desirable domicile for fund managers seeking consistency, reliability, and resilience.6

Though nearly two-thirds of the ELTIFs established so far are based in Luxembourg,7 Ireland is looking to increase its prominence as an ELTIF domicile: in 2024, for example, the Central Bank of Ireland (CBI) introduced a dedicated ELTIF Chapter in its AIF Rulebook to facilitate the domestic implementation of ELTIF regulations and provide a pathway for ELTIFs seeking authorization in Ireland.8

Additional private asset funds in Luxembourg

·         UCI Part II Fund

·         Specialised Investment Fund (SIF)

·         Reserved Alternative Investment Fund (RAIF)

·         Société d’investissement en capital à risqué (SICAR Fund)

·         Société en commandite par action (SCA)

·         Société en commandite simple (SCS)

·         Société en commandite spéciale (SCSp)

Additional private asset funds in Ireland

·         Investment Limited Partnership (ILP)

·         Irish Collective Asset Management Vehicle (ICAV)

As asset managers explore the various private asset fund structure options available between Luxembourg and Ireland, it is up to them to evaluate which fund structures in either of the two domiciles might best fit their needs.

ETF contenders

Amid the enthusiasm in Europe for ETFs, particularly active ETFs, Ireland and Luxembourg are the two main players when it comes to domiciling cross-border funds. Europe’s leading ETF domicile is Ireland, where more than three-quarters (78%) of European ETFs are domiciled.9 Luxembourg, where 16% of European ETFs are domiciled, is Europe’s distant No. 2.10

Ireland is dominant as an ETF domicile for a number of reasons, including the fact that it has comprehensive double taxation treaties with 75 countries in effect and double taxation agreements signed with three additional countries.11 Notably, Irish ETFs with U.S. equity exposure may benefit from a reduced 15% withholding tax on U.S. dividend income. Large passive managers with high exposure to U.S. assets have established low-cost passive tracker funds in Ireland over any other European domicile. In addition, Ireland does not levy a subscription tax on ETFs.

Although investment funds in Ireland are exempt from corporate tax, their suppliers – such as auditors, consultants, and lawyers – pay 12.5% on average in corporate tax compared to 25% in Luxembourg. Also in Ireland’s favor are attractive structures that facilitate market entry into active ETFs. A recent CBI clarification enables the creation of listed ETF share-classes within mutual funds without the UCITS ETF moniker at the sub-fund level.12 Another recent advent at the beginning of 2025 is the CBI’s authorization of ETFs offering 100% exposure to collateralized loan obligations (CLO), something that was already possible in Luxembourg.13

Though Ireland has been dominating the ETF sector, Luxembourg is attempting to lap at its heels. Luxembourg benefits from comprehensive double taxation treaties with 92 countries.14 Despite Ireland’s strong ETF market, Luxembourg can effectively counter these advantages through mimicking U.S. ETFs in a process called “synthetic replication.”15 In addition, though passive ETFs had been exempt from paying subscription tax in Luxembourg, legislation from Luxembourg’s parliament effective January 2025 discontinued the levying of a subscription tax on active ETFs in Luxembourg as well.16

The Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier (CSSF), the Luxembourg financial services regulator, is also collaborating with the financial sector to promote ETF adoption, including a new fast-track approval process.17 Luxembourg also has its own equivalent of ETFs as a share class: its UCITS vehicles, especially Sociétés d’investissement à Capital Variable (SICAVs), now offer ETF share classes within existing mutual fund structures.

There is another recent ETF change afoot, with Ireland and Luxembourg enhancing their capabilities as ETF domiciles: in December 2024, the CSSF relaxed portfolio transparency requirements for active ETFs by permitting managers to publish holdings with a one-month lag.18 Irish regulators responded in kind: in April 2025, the CBI provided the ability to establish semi-transparent ETFs by amending its requirements for portfolio transparency and allowing ETFs to disclose portfolio holdings only at each calendar quarter.19

As with asset managers examining which private asset funds to launch in either Luxembourg or Ireland, those considering an ETF product may benefit from seeking a trusted partner in the process.

Fund services for wherever you domicile

Whether launching a private asset fund or an ETF in Luxembourg or Ireland, an asset manager has a particular set of needs for servicing and supporting these funds according to the intricate regulatory environment of either of these two prominent cross-border fund ecosystems.

To take advantage of these cross-border fund centres, of course, those very asset managers need assistance with fund services and wrapper creation. We at J.P. Morgan utilize our expertise and technology to service these innovative fund structures, meeting the needs of both institutional and retail investors. 

References

1.

Cross-Border Distribution of Investment Funds, Association of the Luxembourg Fund Industry (ALFI), April 2025

2.

Luxembourg: An Introduction to Investments, Chambers and Partners

3.

Fresh Momentum for the Reformed European Long-Term Investment Fund (ELTIF), J.P. Morgan

4.

Fresh Momentum for the Reformed European Long-Term Investment Fund (ELTIF), J.P. Morgan

5.

How Ireland and Luxembourg Attract First-Time European Fund Managers, CSC, May 2, 2024

6.

Unlocking the EU’s asset management market: The role of Luxembourg for Asian fund managers, March 21, 2024

7.

Ibid.

8.

Feedback Statement Consultation Paper 155: Consultation on ELTIF chapter in the AIF Rulebook, Central Bank of Ireland

9.

ETFs 2029: The path to $30 trillion, PwC, March 4, 2025

10.

Ibid.

11.

Double Taxation Treaties, Revenue: Irish Tax and Customs, Jan. 10, 2025

12.

The Rise of ETF Shares Classes of Mutual Funds, J.P. Morgan, May 5, 2025

13.

Irish regulators give green light for 100% CLO exposure in UCITS, 9fin, November 7, 2024

14.

Luxembourg: Individual – Foreign tax relief and tax treaties, PwC, Jan. 21, 2025

15.

Can Luxembourg ride the active ETF wave?, etfexpress, May 23, 2025

16.

Luxembourg exempts active ETFs from subscription tax, ETF Express, Dec. 20, 2024

17.

 Can Luxembourg ride the active ETF wave?, etfexpress, May 23, 2025

18.

Luxembourg regulator to relax transparency requirements for active ETFs, ETF Stream, December 19, 2024

19.

UCITS Questions and Answers 42nd Edition, Central Bank of Ireland, April 17, 2025

Related insights

  • Securities Services

    Private markets court high-net-worth investors

    February 27, 2025

    To capture the $66 trillion of available capital in U.S. wealth management, private fund managers are increasingly structuring creative products to cater to retail investors. Find out more about the innovative fund structures that have appeared in accordance with regional regulations.

  • Securities Services

    The active ETF state of play: A worldview of the growing trend

    March 05, 2025

    Find out how asset managers can capitalize on varied investor demand globally.

  • Securities Services

    Asset owners in alternative investments: Driving operational efficiency

    October 23, 2024

    As investment in private markets rises, limited partners face data management and portfolio administration challenges. Read more on how asset owners are seeking operational efficiency amidst this growing trend.

JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., organized under the laws of U.S.A. with limited liability, is regulated by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency in the U.S.A., as well as the regulations of the countries in which it or its affiliates undertake regulated activities. For additional regulatory disclosures regarding J.P. Morgan entities, please consult: www.jpmorgan.com/disclosures. These materials have been prepared exclusively for the internal use of the J.P. Morgan’s clients and prospective client to whom it is addressed (including the clients’ affiliates, the “Company”) in order to assist the Company in evaluating, on a preliminary basis, certain products or services that may be provided by J.P. Morgan. These materials have been provided for discussion purposes only and are incomplete without reference to, and should be viewed solely in conjunction with, the oral briefing provided by J.P. Morgan. These materials may not be disclosed, published, disseminated or used for anyother purpose without the prior written consent of J.P. Morgan. If the recipient of this communication is in Switzerland, the information provided in this document is for information purposes only and does not constitute an offer, a solicitation, or a recommendation, to purchase any financial instruments. Where applicable, the information provided in this document constitutes an advertisement (within the meaning of art. 69 of the Swiss Financial Services Act (“FinSA”)) for the financial services referred to herein. The statements in this presentation are confidential and proprietary to J.P. Morgan and are not intended to be legally binding. In preparing this presentation, J.P. Morgan has relied upon and assumed, without independent verification, the accuracy and completeness of all information available from public sources. Neither J.P. Morgan nor any of its directors, officers, employees or agents shall incur any responsibility or liability whatsoever to the Company or any other party in respect of the contents of this document or any matters referred to in, or discussed as a result of, this presentation. J.P. Morgan makes no representations as to the legal, regulatory, tax or accounting implications of the matters referred to in this document. J.P. Morgan may hold a position or act as market maker in the financial instruments of any issuer discussed herein or act as advisor or lender to such issuer. The products and services described in this document are offered by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. or its affiliates subject to applicable laws and regulations and service terms. Not all products and services are available in all locations. Eligibility for particular products and services will be determined by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and/or its affiliates.