What the Midterms Mean for Markets
  • A divided government will result in legislative gridlock, limiting the rollout of new taxation or spending initiatives.
  • However, it historically spells good news for equity markets. In a midterm election year, the average return for the S&P 500 is 14.3% six months from the end of October compared with 3.7% in a non-election year.
  • The impact on Treasury markets will be more limited, even though there could be a debt ceiling standoff.

On November 8, 2022, voters flocked to the polls in droves, casting more than 42 million ballots in the U.S. midterm elections. While most pundits predicted a “red wave”—with Republicans seizing control of both the House and the Senate—the results were far more closely contested. As of November 17, Republicans have retaken the House by a slim margin, while Democrats have overcome the odds and narrowly retained the Senate after securing seats in Arizona and Nevada. This has resulted in a divided government, in which one party controls the White House and another party controls at least one chamber of Congress.

U.S. stocks rallied in the days after the election, with better-than-expected inflation data driving markets—suggesting further interest rate hikes from the Federal Reserve could be slower than investors had anticipated. Looking ahead, what does a divided government mean for markets in the coming months?

A divided government is a positive outcome for continued outperformance and leadership in the energy sector.

The outlook for equity markets

Historically, the midterm elections act as a tailwind of sorts for equity markets. “In a non-election year, you might see the S&P 500 having average returns of 3.7% six months from the end of October and 5.3% 12 months from the end of October,” said Thomas Salopek, who covers Global Cross-Asset Strategy for J.P. Morgan. “In a midterm election year, the average returns are 14.3% six months from the end of October and 16.4% 12 months from the end of October. These are very striking numbers.”

Stocks have historically outperformed after a midterm election

Bar chart showing that average S&P 500 returns were significantly higher in years with midterm elections compared to those without.

In addition, stocks tend to rally under a divided government. This is because prevailing fiscal policies will likely remain in place as any new measures tabled by one party will be blocked by the other, thereby creating more stability and certainty for investors. “The markets like gridlock,” said Salopek. 

At the industry level, a Democrat–Republican split spells good news for certain sectors, including utilities and energy. “A divided government is a positive outcome for continued outperformance and leadership in the energy sector. Energy companies could continue to thrive when the government puts restrictions on supply, without the headline risk that the government might try to levy a tax,” said Dubravko Lakos-Bujas, Chief Equity Macro Strategist and Head of LATAM Equity Research at J.P. Morgan. “And while aerospace and defense historically benefits from a Republican-controlled government, I would argue that the industry will do well in a gridlocked scenario, given the current geopolitical backdrop.” 

The outlook for Treasury markets

Unlike with equities, a divided government will have limited bearing on Treasury markets. “There is little we can expect on the legislative and fiscal front, so that won’t have an impact on the issuance profile for the U.S. Treasury for 2023—a year in which we see the budget deficit widening and the issuance need increasing, but largely being funded via Treasury bills,” said Jay Barry, Co-Head of U.S. Rates Strategy at J.P. Morgan.

Of course, a divided government could well lead to a debt ceiling standoff. The Treasury is projected to reach its authorized $31.4 billion borrowing limit in early 2023 and Republicans will likely oppose further increases in a bid to cut spending on Democrat-backed initiatives such as Medicare. However, a combination of “extraordinary measures” (temporary accounting maneuvers that allow the government to continue standard operations for a limited period) and cash on hand will likely give the Treasury borrowing capacity well into next year. “The debt ceiling debate probably won’t begin until the first or second quarter of 2023, so at this point, it’s hard to expect it to mean anything for the Treasury markets,” noted Barry. 

The outlook for credit markets

In the same vein, a divided government will not have a significant impact on credit markets. “The reaction function in liquid credit index products is rather benign, and I don’t think the midterm results will materially change anything. We’re still focused on the Fed’s terminal rate and how quickly we get there,” said Stephen Dulake, Global Head of Credit, Securitized Products and Public Finance Research at J.P. Morgan. “The real question is the strength of the recent rally in developed credit markets—to what extent has it been something of a drawdown on 2023 performance?” 

The macroeconomic picture

Overall, a divided government will result in legislative gridlock, limiting the rollout of new taxation or spending initiatives. “We can expect no major legislation over the next two years. It’s safe to say that we won’t see fiscal expansion with a Republican House. The question is, can the House force some fiscal contraction by creating problems through government funding or the debt ceiling?” said Michael Feroli, U.S. Economist at J.P. Morgan. “But until we run into a funding or a debt ceiling issue, we don’t think there are many implications for the macro outlook.”

However, a divided government will likely turn its attention to other economic and political issues. “You’ll see more bipartisan support to take a tougher stance of China—policies that will increase competitiveness and safeguard the supply chain,” said Joyce Chang, Chair of Global Research at J.P. Morgan. “There will be more scrutiny of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act and the Inflation Reduction Act, and there are also bound to be questions on whether free trade could return to the agenda.” 

What do voters want?

Overall, the state of the markets is a key consideration among the American public. The economy remains the top issue for voters, data from Pew Research Center shows, and 70% of U.S. consumers say they are very or somewhat concerned about how the stock market is doing. 

The economy remains top of mind for voters

Infographic showing the economy was the most important issue for American voters in the 2022 congressional elections, followed by democracy.

The soaring cost of living is another major topic. Some 95% of American consumers state they are very or somewhat concerned about the price of food and consumer goods, 93% say the same about the price of gasoline and energy and 87% about the cost of housing.

Clearly, Congress has numerous issues to grapple with, from the economy and markets to food, health care and housing. And every move it makes will be closely watched by voters as well as investors, who will be keen to discover where opportunities lie. 

Related insights

  • Global Research

    Global Research

    Leveraging cutting-edge technology and innovative tools to bring clients industry-leading analysis and investment advice.

This communication is provided for information purposes only. Please read J.P. Morgan research reports related to its contents for more information, including important disclosures. JPMorgan Chase & Co. or its affiliates and/or subsidiaries (collectively, J.P. Morgan) normally make a market and trade as principal in securities, other financial products and other asset classes that may be discussed in this communication.

This communication has been prepared based upon information, including market prices, data and other information, from sources believed to be reliable, but J.P. Morgan does not warrant its completeness or accuracy except with respect to any disclosures relative to J.P. Morgan and/or its affiliates and an analyst's involvement with any company (or security, other financial product or other asset class) that may be the subject of this communication. Any opinions and estimates constitute our judgment as of the date of this material and are subject to change without notice. Past performance is not indicative of future results. This communication is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument. J.P. Morgan Research does not provide individually tailored investment advice. Any opinions and recommendations herein do not take into account individual client circumstances, objectives, or needs and are not intended as recommendations of particular securities, financial instruments or strategies to particular clients. You must make your own independent decisions regarding any securities, financial instruments or strategies mentioned or related to the information herein. Periodic updates may be provided on companies, issuers or industries based on specific developments or announcements, market conditions or any other publicly available information. However, J.P. Morgan may be restricted from updating information contained in this communication for regulatory or other reasons. Clients should contact analysts and execute transactions through a J.P. Morgan subsidiary or affiliate in their home jurisdiction unless governing law permits otherwise.

This communication may not be redistributed or retransmitted, in whole or in part, or in any form or manner, without the express written consent of J.P. Morgan. Any unauthorized use or disclosure is prohibited. Receipt and review of this information constitutes your agreement not to redistribute or retransmit the contents and information contained in this communication without first obtaining express permission from an authorized officer of J.P. Morgan.