5 takeaways from the first fed banner

Federal Reserve policymakers cut the federal funds rate by 25 basis points—a quarter of a percentage point, in line J.P. Morgan Chief U.S. Economist Michael Feroli’s view.

“While this was consistent with our expectations, the signaling was apparently more hawkish than the market was anticipating,” Feroli writes in a research note titled Fed cuts, contemplates, and confounds.

Markets were prepared for a potential 50 basis point cut, but J.P. Morgan research analysts weighed it out. In the past, the Fed has only eased 50 basis points during a financial crisis or if it felt behind the curve when the economy showed signs of distress.

“The press conference was destined to be a challenging affair,” writes Feroli. “The marginal news on growth, inflation and trade policy has all been favorable since June and yet Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell had to defend the decision to cut rates now instead of June.

”In prepared remarks Powell indicated that information on global growth, trade policy uncertainty and muted inflation developments all motivated the decision to cut rates.

But market participants honed in on an unprepared remark in which Powell characterized the move as a “mid-cycle adjustment to policy” in contrast to “the beginning of a lengthy cutting cycle.”

He later refined this hawkish comment a bit by saying that it doesn’t necessarily mean “it’s just one” cut. The “the now-famous remark” on mid-cycle adjustment to policy was in response to the first question, which related to what the Fed would need to see to cut rates again.

“While Powell’s presser stole the show, the post-meeting statement had some notable changes as well,” writes Feroli.

In June, the Fed statement vowed to “closely monitor” developments. In the July meeting, it dialed the alert state down a level by dropping the word “closely.” Feroli also notes the Fed added a “curious” phrase:

“As the Committee contemplates the future path of the target range of the federal funds rate…”

“It’s hard to know exactly how to interpret this, but it does sound like they are emphasizing there is no predetermined path for the funds rate,” writes Feroli. “The statement still has an easing bias, but does not guarantee future action.”

J.P. Morgan research analysts are looking for another cut in September.

Since the last FOMC meeting in June, economic data have generally been better than expected while uncertainties have not convincingly increased.

Asked how data informed and will inform Fed thinking, Powell said: “Going forward… we’ll be monitoring the evolution of trade uncertainty, of global growth, and of low inflation. And we’ll also be monitoring the performance of the U.S. economy.”

“Domestic economic performance did not loom large in today’s decision, but we believe it will be more important in future decisions,” writes Feroli.

As expected, the Committee ended balance sheet normalization—the runoff of the Fed’s $3.8 trillion asset portfolio—six weeks earlier than scheduled.

“We suspect there are many on the FOMC who did not want to alter the plan to end balance sheet normalization in September, but the leadership prevailed,” writes Feroli.

In a surprise move, both the mildly hawkish Kansas City Fed President Esther George and Boston Fed President Eric Rosengren dissented for no change. J.P. Morgan research analysts thought only George would dissent.

Quarles and Rosengren may each retain some reservations about easing.

“Rosengren is one of the thought leaders on the Committee,” writes Feroli. “He had an important role in the genesis of the current framework review and has had prescient policy calls in the past.”

Rosengren dissented for more aggressively dovish policy in late 2007. In late 2016, he argued for the Fed to hasten policy normalization, a view picked up by the rest of the Committee in March 2017.

Related insights

  • Global Research

    Mid-year market outlook 2019: Central banks stay easy and in sync

    July 05, 2019

    Key themes for investors in the second half of 2019, as global central bank easing becomes more synchronized.

  • Global Research

    A primer on sponsored repo

    April 16, 2019

    How has the world of fixed-income financing evolved?

  • Global Research

    ETFs: The race to zero fees

    May 16, 2019

    Average ETF fees in the U.S. have tumbled around 40% over the last eight years, as competition for market share has heated up and issuers respond to the growing demand for lower fee funds.

This communication is provided for information purposes only. Please read J.P. Morgan research reports related to its contents for more information, including important disclosures. JPMorgan Chase & Co. or its affiliates and/or subsidiaries (collectively, J.P. Morgan) normally make a market and trade as principal in securities, other financial products and other asset classes that may be discussed in this communication. This communication has been prepared based upon information, including market prices, data and other information, from sources believed to be reliable, but J.P. Morgan does not warrant its completeness or accuracy except with respect to any disclosures relative to J.P. Morgan and/or its affiliates and an analyst's involvement with any company (or security, other financial product or other asset class) that may be the subject of this communication. Any opinions and estimates constitute our judgment as of the date of this material and are subject to change without notice. Past performance is not indicative of future results. This communication is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument. J.P. Morgan Research does not provide individually tailored investment advice. Any opinions and recommendations herein do not take into account individual client circumstances, objectives, or needs and are not intended as recommendations of particular securities, financial instruments or strategies to particular clients. You must make your own independent decisions regarding any securities, financial instruments or strategies mentioned or related to the information herein. Periodic updates may be provided on companies, issuers or industries based on specific developments or announcements, market conditions or any other publicly available information. However, J.P. Morgan may be restricted from updating information contained in this communication for regulatory or other reasons. Clients should contact analysts and execute transactions through a J.P. Morgan subsidiary or affiliate in their home jurisdiction unless governing law permits otherwise. This communication may not be redistributed or retransmitted, in whole or in part, or in any form or manner, without the express written consent of J.P. Morgan. Any unauthorized use or disclosure is prohibited. Receipt and review of this information constitutes your agreement not to redistribute or retransmit the contents and information contained in this communication without first obtaining express permission from an authorized officer of J.P. Morgan