Momentum is Mixed

In early April while other nations remained in lockdown, China began lifting restrictions and reopening the economy in Wuhan, and other affected areas of China, after more than two months. With its reopening, nations and policymakers are looking to China as an example for economic recovery, although such a comparison may be challenging given unique Chinese characteristics such as its overall response to the virus and its ability to enforce full lockdowns, as well as its restrictions on foreign capital inflows and outflows. While the focus is on the Chinese path to stabilization and economic growth, the recent return of partial lockdown measures in Beijing has raised questions about the potential impact of a “second wave” and highlights the unpredictable road to recovery.

Positive Momentum toward Economic Repair

Pre-pandemic levels of China’s Purchasing Manager Index (PMI) were 50.2 in December and November of 2019 (>50.0 indicates an expansion)1. The index dropped 14.3 points from January to February before quickly rebounding in March to 52.0.

With the easing of travel restrictions, average daily flights from China have increased ~60% since the end of March. China’s retail segment is also showing signs of life after declining 21% in January and February. J.P. Morgan Research expects strengthening retail and consumer trends, with tailwinds from consumption repatriations and government stimulus. Although the May sales report recorded a 2.8% YOY decline, this was an improvement from April’s 7.5% YOY decline.

The pandemic had a major impact on China in Q1, with GDP contracting 6.8%. However, J.P. Morgan Research is forecasting Q2 China GDP to moderately grow at 1%, with a return to normalized growth in Q3 to 5.1%2.

U.S. Likely to Experience a More Prolonged Recovery

The U.S. PMI index has experienced a more gradual decline from 50.9 in January to 41.5 in April, before rebounding slightly in May to 43.1.3

Since the end of March, the daily average number of U.S. flights has increased negligibly due largely to travel restrictions and stay-at-home mandates. On May 15, the U.S. Census Bureau reported a record 16.4% decline in U.S. retail sales, nearly double the previous month’s decline of 8.3%. Economists are forecasting unemployment to remain in the double digits, currently at 13.3% as of March, which will continue to be a downside driver to a path to recovery.4

In contrast to China GDP growth, which is showing signs of a V-shaped recovery, the U.S is still largely feeling the effects of the pandemic. U.S. Q1 GDP declined 4.8%, however economists expect the brunt of the recession to be borne by Q2’s GDP, which is expected to decline ~40% from the previous quarter. J.P. Morgan Research forecasts GDP will continue to decline this year, with growth not occurring until a full year later in Q2 2021 at a quarterly change of 10.4%.5

Activism in Asia Ramps Up

Once only representing 15% of global activist investor campaigns in 2012, Asia Pacific now comprises more than a quarter of global campaigns. However, Asia has a long way to go before activism is as pervasive as it is in other regions, such as the U.S. Globally, four out of five activist campaigns demanding a board seat in the first quarter of 2020 were successful. While Asia lags other locations when it comes to the percentage of board directors who are independent, could 2020 be a turning point based on global success rates?

Campaigns typically target blue chip companies in Asia Pacific, similar to other regions, but approaches vary. Notably, cultural differences in business practices are likely driving alternate activism methods in Asia. Activists have found it necessary to alter their typical course of action in order to find success, primarily by accepting the need for greater patience. Whatever their goals entail, activists in Asia are committed to their campaigns.

For example, Elliott Management has held a stake in Bank of East Asia (“BEA”) for years, and is finally beginning to see the company respond to its demands. Elliott initially sued BEA in 2015 for access to information about a share placement transaction. After gaining this information, Elliott sued again, alleging the share placement made the company “takeover proof” and entrenched management. Elliott’s most recent suit was due to be heard in May of this year. However, BEA retained financial and strategic advisors to review its business in March, leading to a halt in this legal action by Elliott.

History has shown that activists are willing to invest not only time (measured in years) but also financial resources to see their campaigns through. In light of these facts, engaging with advisors proactively to evaluate activist proposals and risks could be beneficial for management in this region.

Notably, cultural differences in business practices are likely driving alternate activism methods in Asia.

Chinese Companies Weigh Uncertainty of Future U.S. Relations and Implications for Listing Venues

Congress is reportedly looking into creating a law that would mandate the delisting of Chinese firms unless certain conditions are met, which may be nearly impossible to comply with. This news has increased uncertainty among would-be U.S. listers. Some of these firms, such as and NetEase, have already listed in Hong Kong, where they have found initial strongly positive local market reactions. Some investors assert firms that list on the Hong Kong stock exchange, instead of U.S. exchanges, are able to achieve a higher valuation multiple. One theory is that U.S. investors’ home bias may limit the enthusiasm for foreign companies’ stock trading on U.S. exchanges.

The trend of choosing to list on the Hong Kong stock exchange has been prevalent for years, following the announcement in April 2018 that allowed companies with multi-class share structures. This change ultimately led to a 23% increase year-over-year for Hong Kong IPOs in 2019, pushing the exchange to the number one rank globally; projections for 2020 remain elevated. New uncertainties provide another data point for firms to potentially favor listing in Hong Kong.

The Hong Kong stock exchange’s issuer-friendly policies and the potential for a valuation premium, regardless of underlying rationale, continue to provide a strong argument for global firms to list their Asian subsidiaries in Hong Kong. Some of these advantages can ultimately lead a firm to pursue an IPO of a subsidiary over other forms of monetization, such as a spin-off or carve-out. It remains important for firms to stay aware of ongoing developments in political dialogue and market environments to make informed strategic decisions.



National Bureau of Statistics of China


J.P. Morgan Markets-China Economic Forecast


ISM report


U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics


J.P. Morgan Markets-U.S. Economic Forecast

The Corporate Finance Advisory team examines themes or trends that serve as a source of thought-leadership for management teams. Areas covered traditionally include corporate strategy and M&A, capital markets, capital structure/ allocation, market intelligence, or other accounting and regulatory subject matter.

This material is not a product of the Research Departments of J.P. Morgan and is not a research report. Unless otherwise specifically stated, any views or opinions expressed herein are solely those of the authors listed, and may differ from the views and opinions expressed by J.P. Morgan’s Research Departments or other departments or divisions of J.P. Morgan and its affiliates.

RESTRICTED DISTRIBUTION: Distribution of these materials is permitted to investment banking clients of J.P. Morgan.

Distribution of these materials to others is not permitted unless specifically approved by J.P. Morgan. These materials are for your personal use only. Any distribution, copy, reprints and/or forward to others is strictly prohibited. Information has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable but J.P. Morgan does not warrant its completeness or accuracy. Information herein constitutes our judgment as of the date of this material and is subject to change without notice. Actual events or conditions are unlikely to be consistent with, and may differ materially from, those assumed. Accordingly, actual results will vary and the variations may be material.

This material is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument. In no event shall J.P. Morgan be liable for any use by any party of, for any decision made or action taken by any party in reliance upon, or for any inaccuracies or errors in, or omissions from, the information contained herein and such information may not be relied upon by you in evaluating the merits of participating in any transaction. J.P. Morgan makes no representations as to the legal, tax or accounting consequences of a transaction. The recipient should consult their own legal, regulatory, investment, tax, accounting and other professional advisers as deemed necessary in connection with any purchase of a financial product. This material is for the general information of our clients and is a “solicitation” only as that term is used within CFTC Rule 1.71 and 23.605 promulgated under the U.S. Commodity Exchange Act. Questions regarding swap transactions or swap trading strategies should be directed to one of the Associated Persons of J.P. Morgan’s Swap Dealers.

JPMorgan Chase and its affiliates do not provide tax, legal or accounting advice. This material has been prepared for informational purposes only, and is not intended to provide, and should not be relied on for, tax, legal or accounting advice. You should consult your own tax, legal and accounting advisors before engaging in any transaction.

J.P. Morgan is a marketing name for investment banking businesses of JPMorgan Chase & Co. and its subsidiaries worldwide. Securities, syndicated loan arranging, financial advisory and other investment banking activities are performed by a combination of J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, J.P. Morgan Limited, J.P. Morgan Securities plc and the appropriately licensed subsidiaries of JPMorgan Chase & Co. in EMEA and Asia-Pacific. Lending, derivatives and other commercial banking activities are performed by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. J.P. Morgan deal team members may be employees of any of the foregoing entities.

Related insights