Video Series:

Security and Resiliency in Action

JPMorganChase is championing long-term economic security and resiliency by supporting critical industries including supply chain and manufacturing, defense and aerospace, energy independence and resilience, strategic and frontier technologies, and pharma and healthtech.

Learn more here.

Dr. Sarah Kapnick:

With matters in national security, you want to make sure that you have resilience against multiple different scenarios. And so a diversified energy mix is really important for making sure that you have that diversity in all of your supply chains, but also all the energy that's coming onto the grid.

Michael Johnson:

So the Security and Resiliency Initiative, which we call SRI, is a commitment on two fronts. It's a trillion-and-a-half-dollar commitment to facilitate and finance and invest in companies over the next 10 years that fall within security and resiliency in secure supply chains, in defense, in energy, in frontier technologies, and in pharma and healthcare.

Dr. Sarah Kapnick:

I find it's really important for the future of innovation of science and technology being commercialized because these new technologies, they're capital intensive. The SRI initiative is going to be so important for scaling these types of companies and really allowing them to grow so then we have access to those technologies. And all of the different areas that we're focused on funding and financing, they are what we will need in this changing world going forward. We need new types of pharma. We need new sources of energy. We need more resilient grids. We need quantum and other computing capabilities because that is the future that will drive economies. And so I'm really excited about all the activities that we're doing because we're really supporting the future of the economy.

Michael Johnson:

The scaling is such a great point. The trillion and a half dollars over 10 years, we would've already done a trillion dollars of activity, just our normal business, but we added 50% or $500 billion of additional scaling. And that's exactly because of what you said. It's that capital intensity of all these businesses that need it.

Dr. Sarah Kapnick:

Yeah. And if the private sector doesn't support these things, we will not see that growth and we will not see that innovation. So I'm hopeful that doing this is going to accelerate all that innovation and accelerate the economy in ways that otherwise wouldn't have happened if we had not made this initiative.

Michael Johnson:

So data centers in the US will start there, have been playing what I call a game of musical chairs for the last two years. And that's going around the country and finding spots of excess power because our grid, as you know, there's not one grid. There are many small grids and there are different levels of usage. And they were able to find places in Columbus, Ohio or Atlanta, Georgia, or Fort Worth, Texas that had latent power that was excess power and they could sign a 15-year contract and build it. That's all taken up. All the excess is gone. And now the real challenge is they have to bring power with them.

Dr. Sarah Kapnick:

Yeah, I agree. It was a race to collect all the low hanging fruit. And now people are realizing they really need to think about the planning in ways that they haven't previously. And so now we're going to see more interesting financing. We're going to see new technologies brought online. We're going to see new types of companies that haven't existed before that are going to try and piece together all those problems to be able to bring the energy online.

Michael Johnson:

I think we both know natural gas is going to be one of the biggest sources in the near term. And then they'll layer in solar and wind to decarbonize that and to add electrons. And then longer term, I think starting in 2030, really ramping up 2035, we'll have nuclear really kicking into the grid.

Dr. Sarah Kapnick:

Storage has been incredibly important in the recent years to also bring that online in Texas. That is where storage has been being put onto the grid to be able to take all that excess also from when the wind blows for then when the energy is needed, and same with solar. And that will be really important with these data centers as they're trying to bring it on with renewable energy sources on site as well. And also for the backup power when there's grid intermittency problems, because those data centers need power all the time. And so those will be put in place also to ensure that they have that steady power that they are needed.

Michael Johnson:

The storage, I agree with you, and it's being added like crazy every day, but they still can't get storage to be much longer than four hours. Is that right?

Dr. Sarah Kapnick:

There are a couple early-stage companies, and that's part of the reason SRI is so important, is that there are early companies that are out there that are starting to be built and they're building their first factories for storage that goes out to a hundred hours. And so those need to be built up and they're CapEx intensive. And I think we're going to see more of these companies available and making that later stage with the investments and they need to be deployed because the demand is there for more than four hours. A diversified energy mix is really important for ensuring that you actually can get all the electrons on the grid, but also as you are trying to balance the loads from the different energy sources, it allows for being able to ensure that you can have all that energy continuously and meeting the demand and the demand through many different times when you have extreme weather of heat, when you have cold, you have to actually have that full mix to be able to make sure that you're bringing enough onto the grid and being able to balance all of that as that's coming online.

Michael Johnson:

It is a balancing act. It's amazing to me that grids keep producing with all the demands and all the changes and all the weather, but I'm curious, the point you made about all the sources, how do you feel about dispatchable twenty-four seven energy versus intermittent energy and how they play into the mix?

Dr. Sarah Kapnick:

Well, I see it as a scientist. It's a big science question, an optimization problem of being able to get all those different sources on. And historically with the grid, as you were saying, dispatchable and twenty-four seven, there were certain types of energy that it was really fossil fuel based where you had to have it where you could fire it up, fire it down. But now when we have all these different sources, but also new grid technologies, you can have the baseload power with nuclear, you can have wind, you can have solar, you end up now having storage coming online in larger quantities because they're trying to be able to match it for when you have supply versus when you have demand. And as more technology of smart technology for grid management becomes available, you integrate all of those in to be able to actually use the sources of the energy that you have on the grid.

Michael Johnson:

The most exciting things in dispatchable energy, you know I believe this, geothermal, right? I really think it's time has come and it's been promised for a long time, but the new methodology, the new technology really are going to break through I think finally. So that's one of the most exciting developments. The other one, of course, is nuclear, which has been long the promised land. And I'm curious if you agree with this. When my kids ask me, how are we really going to reduce carbon emissions? I say one of the best solutions is broad use of nuclear.

Dr. Sarah Kapnick:

Oh, I agree. And it's starting to come back with people are very excited about nuclear and the future of that technology. I'll also add on geothermal. Part of this unlocking is where technology is and being able to drill further down and being able to drill horizontal wells. That is being able to place geothermal in places where we haven't had geothermal before. And so instead of just being in those tectonically active places where geothermal has traditionally been, you're going to be able to unlock the capability across many more land spaces around the United States, but also globally. With matters of national security, you want to make sure that you have resilience against multiple different scenarios. And so a diversified energy mix is really important for making sure that you have that diversity in all of your supply chains, but also all the energy that's coming onto the grid. And that protects against trade issues. It protects against supply chain issues. For renewables, sometimes it also protects against certain types of weather. And so you have that layering of these different types of energy that allow for it to be continuously available so you don't have any of those weak links that could lead to blackouts and brownouts.

Michael Johnson:

I totally agree. Think of if you've only had gas when Uri hit in Texas, you just would've had no power, which they had for a short amount of time. So sometimes wind and solar pick up the slack, sometimes gas picks up, gas fired power picks up the slack. And I also think that a diversified source actually helps internationally because think about the generation growth that we've had in this country from solar. That actually allows us to export more gas, which helps the allies.

Dr. Sarah Kapnick:

Well, and I'm also seeing it outside the United States. There's an interest in self-sufficiency of energy. And so there's this push towards development of renewables, development of storage so that they're no longer beholden to volatility for certain types of energy, but then also to be able to produce their own and not have to rely on imports continuously. But that's once they have the infrastructure in place. And the trading partner diversity matters then for what's actually being built as well.

Michael Johnson:

Remember when energy independence was a pipe dream and a joke in this country? We just really never thought it could happen, and then it happened. Clients tell me, if you give the engineers enough time and enough money, they will figure it out. And we've seen that happen.

Dr. Sarah Kapnick:

Oh, as a scientist, I completely agree with that statement.

Michael Johnson:

In deal making, what we're seeing is consolidation with different kinds of energy. So think of companies that are big nuclear producers buying natural gas so that now they can- Why is that? So that they can just provide more forms of energy. If you're good at natural gas, you can stand up new generation quickly, and if you're good at nuclear, you can stand up low carbon generation for the long run. So the same companies are combining to be able to do both of those.

Dr. Sarah Kapnick:

And is that because of the complexity of the grid that they're trying to generate energy of different types and have control across that? Why is it that they would do that?

Michael Johnson:

It's partly because, to be honest, their economies of scale, big companies can usually become more efficient.

Dr. Sarah Kapnick:

So it's really a big infrastructure play of being able to build all this out at once.

Michael Johnson:

The other thing that we've done, especially as we staff up SRI, is we're starting to tackle the supply chains behind the supply chains, behind the supply chains. And we're going to companies that we're saying, "What are you worried about? " You need to build automobiles, right? What are you worried about? What supplies? What things are you worried? Everybody knows about rare earth magnets. Can't make a car without rare earth magnets, but what else is in the supply chain? And many of the things, tool dyes and things like that are made by small companies, and that's where SRI comes in. We're going to reach all the way down to those and help those.

Dr. Sarah Kapnick:

Yeah. I see this in the way that you're describing it. We're widening the aperture to understand where everything is coming from to make sure that everything fits together so we can be able to do this and build the cars, build whatever it needs to be built.

Michael Johnson:

One of the things we've done that we are very proud of is to help bring to the US shores this giant zinc smelter that's going to create and produce 11 of the 13 critical minerals that we're short of.

Dr. Sarah Kapnick:

Critical minerals are really important for energy resiliency because they are the building blocks for being able to build most energy types. It's important for the wires and the transmission. It's important for solar cell development. It's important for wind. It's important for nuclear. We actually don't have access to many of the minerals that we need to be able to build out the energy of the future unless we start having access to those supplies.

Michael Johnson:

I agree. As we've started to dig into this, now I'm learning, I really need a periodic table on my wall because I'm learning about all these things that I never knew were so important. You can't make an airplane without Scandium. You need bismuth and antimony and germanium and gallium and all these elements that are critical for things we use every day.

The evolving energy landscape

Energy demand is scaling rapidly. The rise of AI and data centers is straining grid capacity, while supply chain disruptions and geopolitical tensions highlight the need for a robust, diversified energy mix. Building resilient energy infrastructure that can withstand shocks is crucial to adapt to new technologies and ensure reliable power for decades to come.

A key pillar of energy independence is diversification. Relying on foreign imports for a majority of energy leaves countries vulnerable to fluctuations in price and supply.  By investing across oil, natural gas, nuclear, solar, wind and geothermal, nations can mitigate energy risk from supply shocks, extreme weather and geopolitical conflict.

 “With matters of national security, you want to make sure that you have resilience against multiple different scenarios, and so a diversified energy mix is really important for making sure that you have that diversity in all of your supply chains,” said Dr. Sarah Kapnick, global head of Climate Advisory at J.P. Morgan. 

Data centers and the new energy challenge

The explosive growth of data centers, driven in part by increased use of artificial intelligence, has fundamentally changed the energy equation. Requirements for adequate space and power are making it increasingly difficult to build and run data centers. This challenge is likely to grow; in the past, data centers could be built in regions with excess grid capacity, but those days are over.

“Data centers in the U.S. have been playing what I call a game of musical chairs for the last two years, and that’s going around the country and finding spots of excess power. Now, that’s all taken up,” said Michael Johnson, SRI lead for Energy and the U.S. Government. “All the excess is gone.”

As data centers are built across the country, quickly establishing new power generation and grid upgrades will be essential. According to J.P. Morgan Research, data centers are expected to account for more than 60% of incremental U.S. power demand by 2029. This time-sensitive demand is driving innovation in on-site generation, energy storage and grid modernization.

“When it comes to energy independence, if you give the engineers enough time and enough money, they will figure out a solution. We’ve seen that happen.” 

Investing in the full energy spectrum

Meeting future energy needs requires a balanced approach. Natural gas remains a cornerstone for reliability, while renewables continue to add lower-cost, clean power. “Natural gas is going to be one of the biggest sources in the near term, and then they’ll layer in solar and wind to decarbonize,” Johnson said. Other sources of power including nuclear and geothermal will round out a more diversified approach to energy generation. 

There has also been increased consolidation in the energy sector, with larger companies acquiring smaller producers to bolster capabilities and provide additional forms of energy. These mergers and acquisitions benefit from economies of scale and the ability to leverage existing infrastructure.

Both large-scale consolidation and energy startups are facing challenges to scaling, including supply chain volatility. To address these challenges, “we’re starting to tackle the supply chains behind the supply chains,” said Johnson. Investing in both the primary and secondary supply chains supporting the development of energy solutions leads to more robust availability of crucial components.

Security and Resiliency Initiative

“With matters of national security, you want to make sure that you have resilience against multiple different scenarios, and so a diversified energy mix is really important for making sure that you have that diversity in all of your supply chains.”

Global energy is at an inflection point. Generating enough affordable, reliable power to support ambitious electrification and data center build out depends upon full development across all strategic energy resources. Doing so will require tactical partnership, robust infrastructure and strategic deployment of capital.

JPMorganChase is proud to support clients driving this transformation, helping finance the secure, abundant energy system that will power America’s next era of growth and competitiveness. The firm’s Security and Resiliency Initiative is a $1.5 trillion, 10-year plan to facilitate, finance and invest in industries critical to national economic security and resiliency. This initiative focuses on key sub-areas including nuclear energy, grid resiliency, distributed energy, battery storage and solar.

“The SRI initiative is going to be so important for scaling [energy] companies and allowing them to grow,” said Dr. Kapnick. “We’re really supporting the future of the economy.” 

Learn more about the Security and Resiliency Initiative here.

LEARN MORE

Related insights