The U.S.-Iran ceasefire agreement, signed on June 17, 2026, led to a partial reopening of the Strait of Hormuz and a temporary suspension of hostilities. Since then, negotiations for a long-term peace deal have been suspended, while a memorandum of understanding has lapsed. Here’s a look at how the conflict has affected commodity markets so far this year — and what might lie ahead.
At the beginning of the conflict, crude oil prices soared past $100 per barrel (bbl) for the first time since 2022, dropping nearly as precipitously after the ceasefire was announced, to a low of $71.57 on July 1. With the conflict intensifying both militarily and economically, and little movement occurring at the negotiating table, the price of oil climbed back above $100/bbl in early September.
Despite the scale and duration of the disruption, the price of crude has remained relatively contained, a phenomenon Natasha Kaneva, head of Global Commodities Research at J.P. Morgan, attributes to three factors.
“First, 2022 showed just how fungible oil is: barrels find a way to flow,” said Kaneva, citing the example of Russia moving oil successfully despite the war. “Workaround pipelines and covert flows from Middle East producers have helped to avert a full-blown oil crisis in 2026.”
“Second, inventories have drawn far more slowly than we forecast earlier,” said Kaneva. Outside the U.S., China and Japan, the rest of the world has drawn surprisingly little from stocks, according to data from Bloomberg. One explanation for this could be policymakers saving inventories for a potentially more difficult moment.
“[Lastly], the burden of rebalancing has fallen on consumers, as companies and households responded by economizing on oil,” Kaneva said. Airlines canceling unprofitable routes, businesses shifting more work online and manufacturers redesigning packaging to reduce petrochemical use are just a few examples of demand replacement.
These adjustment mechanisms could persist, even in a drawn-out conflict scenario — one which, in Kaneva’s view, seems possible.
Meanwhile, an uptick in production from countries such as Brazil, Venezuela, Canada, the U.S. and Guyana could help mitigate an increase in oil prices as more production comes online that won’t be reliant on passage through the Strait.
“If Hormuz remains constrained, we expect incremental barrels to continue emerging through 2027, as producers respond to the strong price incentive to maximize output and revenues,” said Kaneva. “The result is counterintuitive: in a ‘forever conflict’ scenario, Brent could average just $87/bbl in 2027, compared with $64/bbl in our baseline scenario, in which the world enters 2027 at peace.”
“If Hormuz remains constrained, we expect incremental barrels to continue emerging through 2027, as producers respond to the strong price incentive to maximize output and revenues.”
Natasha Kaneva
Head of Global Commodities Strategy, J.P. Morgan
After historic price movements to start the year, gold’s spot price traded sideways for much of the first quarter, continuing to wobble with the onset of hostilities between Israel, Iran and the U.S. An intra-year price floor was reached in June as fears over an energy-driven spike in inflation and the threat of global interest rate hikes strengthened the U.S. dollar as an investor safe haven.
Since then, the price of gold has started to recover. Gregory Shearer, head of Base and Precious Metals Strategy at J.P. Morgan, maintains a constructive long-term view on gold, citing structural drivers like continued central bank buying and the wider trend of de-dollarization.
“We do not think the debasement theme is dead, just currently significantly overshadowed,” said Shearer. “We ultimately see further recovery in prices coming in 2027 as structural central bank and physical buying eventually re-strengthens. However, the intensity of the rebound has been reined in as gold needs a more material dovish pivot from the Fed for demand to once again fire on all cylinders — a needed mechanism to re-accelerate momentum in its longer-term uptrend.”
The conflict in Iran triggered a major supply shock in the aluminum market, as attacks on key Middle East smelters, including two facilities that produced around 4% of global aluminum supply, resulted in prolonged production outages. A sharp spike in aluminum prices followed, with spot prices on the London Metal Exchange (LME) surging from around $3,007 per metric ton (mt) to a high of $3,707/mt in early June — the largest price rally since the onset of the Russia–Ukraine conflict.
“We still forecast a more than two million metric ton aluminum deficit globally between the second and fourth quarter of 2026.”
Gregory Shearer
Head of Base and Precious Metals Strategy, J.P. Morgan
Since the announcement of the ceasefire, key Middle Eastern smelters have restarted production quicker than expected. But concerns remain about an “invisible” aluminum shortage that is still working its way through the supply chain.
“Given the magnitude of the supply shortage facing the market, the aluminum market outside of China needs China to continue to backfill for lost Middle East tons via boosted levels of aluminum product exports,” said Shearer. “We still forecast a more than two million metric ton aluminum deficit globally between the second and fourth quarter of 2026.”
As much as any commodity, global growth seemed poised for disruption as the Iran conflict unfolded. Energy markets and price spikes have led to sticky inflation, and as the conflict wears on, interest rates have turned hawkish.
Yet, while the energy shock may still be reverberating through markets, the effects may prove less extreme in the second half of the year.
“The Middle East conflict has not dampened our conviction that a cyclical upturn is taking hold,” said Bruce Kasman, chief global economist at J.P. Morgan. “Incoming economic reports point to a broadening base of tech spending during the first half of 2026. While the application of new technologies should boost productivity growth, it is also boosting demand and contributing to goods price pressures.”
In addition, there’s evidence of a pickup in non-tech activity as business sentiment rebounds from last year’s depressed levels. This rebound is predicted to be concentrated in Western Europe, which experienced the most significant drop when the Strait closed. There are also signs that labor demand is starting to firm.
“The Middle East conflict has not dampened our conviction that a cyclical upturn is taking hold.”
Bruce Kasman
Chief global economist, J.P. Morgan
Still, the prospect of central banks raising rates could increase the risk of financial stress. “Past experience suggests that an unexpected reset of monetary policy expectations tends to generate financial stress in an otherwise healthy expansion,” said Kasman. “The threat that more action will be required to contain inflation in an environment of above-potential growth is material, particularly as labor markets tighten.”
Global Research
Mid-year market outlook 2026: The tug of war continues
July 01, 2026
While the global expansion stands on solid ground, markets will need to balance competing forces as they head into the second half of the year.
Global Research
The path for silver prices in 2026 and 2027
August 13, 2026
With physical market tightness unwinding and global rate hikes on the horizon, silver faces an uncertain path forward.
Global Research
From tariffs to capex to geopolitics, here are the forces shaping price formation for industrial metals.
This communication is provided for information purposes only. JPMorgan Chase & Co. or its affiliates and/or subsidiaries (collectively, J.P. Morgan) normally make a market and trade as principal in securities, other financial products and other asset classes that may be discussed in this communication. This communication has been prepared based upon information, including market prices, data and other information, from sources believed to be reliable, but J.P. Morgan does not warrant its completeness or accuracy. Any opinions and estimates constitute our judgment as of the date of this material and are subject to change without notice. Past performance is not indicative of future results. This communication is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument. J.P. Morgan Research does not provide individually tailored investment advice. Any opinions and recommendations herein do not take into account individual client circumstances, objectives, or needs and are not intended as recommendations of particular securities, financial instruments or strategies to particular clients. You must make your own independent decisions regarding any securities, financial instruments or strategies mentioned or related to the information herein. Periodic updates may be provided on companies, issuers or industries based on specific developments or announcements, market conditions or any other publicly available information. However, J.P. Morgan may be restricted from updating information contained in this communication for regulatory or other reasons. This communication may not be redistributed or retransmitted, in whole or in part, or in any form or manner, without the express written consent of J.P. Morgan. Any unauthorized use or disclosure is prohibited. Receipt and review of this information constitutes your agreement not to redistribute or retransmit the contents and information contained in this communication without first obtaining express permission from an authorized officer of J.P. Morgan.