The Road to Gender Balance
Steps towards greater diversity in the workplace and in politics have been made, but progress on women in executive leadership has stalled.
March 6, 2019
The movement to improve gender equality continues to gain momentum as more companies and shareholders push for change and government mandates also legislate new requirements. From corporates to Congress, steady progress is being made. At the same time, gender pay equity and C-suite leadership roles remain elusive for most women – factors that investors are starting to pay more attention to. In this report, J.P. Morgan Research takes a look at the latest developments in the gender balance debate across the private and public sectors.
Gender Balance in the Boardroom
With the availability of gender-specific data for individual companies still relatively sparse, the percentage of women on corporate boards remains the most commonly used metric to measure gender balance at work. Gender parity on boards is still a way off, but real progress has been made over the past few years. In 2011, just 14.6% of board seats belonged to women, according to company data from the Fortune 1000 list. This figure climbed to 22% in 2018, up from 20.4% in 2017. When looking at board makeup, size matters too – with the largest companies in the U.S. leading by example. The 100 biggest U.S. companies in the Russell 3000 index, a major index tracked by investors, have the highest percentage of women on boards at 25.3%, up from 23.9% in 2017.
Large caps lead in board gender diversification
Source: 2020 Women on Boards
While female representation on corporate boards has been steadily increasing to a significant level, the same cannot be said of women in the C-suite. In the U.S., just 5% of C-suite seats are occupied by women among Russell 3000 companies, and progress for women gaining CEO seats has been fairly stagnant across regions.
“While progress has been slow, representation for women on corporate boards has improved over time, suggesting a positive impact from inclusion in ESG metrics. In addition, there are also a number of advocacy initiatives in place encouraging firms to bring more women into the C-suite,” said J.P. Morgan U.S. Fixed Income Strategist, Kimberly Harano.
The Gender Pay Gap
Pressure on companies to increase transparency around gender pay equity has continued to build, whether it’s from mandated reporting requirements, industry best practices or shareholder activism. In the U.S., since disclosure of the gender pay gap is still not required at the company level, much of the gender pay gap research is based on census statistics. The Current Population Survey (CPS) is a monthly survey with a sample of 100,000 households, sponsored by the U.S. Census Bureau and the Bureau of Labor Statistics. It shows the gap between female and male median hourly earnings rose from 18.2% in 2017 to 18.9% in 2018.
U.S. gender pay gap
The difference between men’s median weekly earnings and that
of women as a percentage of men’s median earnings*;%
*Includes all full-time wage and salary workers
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Current Population Survey
JPMorgan Chase Expands its Women on the Move Initiative to Female Clients and Consumers +
Women on the Move (WOTM) started as an internal, firmwide initiative to empower female employees to grow their careers. In 2018, we decided to expand the program to include female clients and consumers. It currently has three main objectives: expand women-run businesses, improve women’s financial health and empower women’s career growth.
WOTM aims to serve women-owned or women-run businesses at all stages of development, from startups to global enterprises, by providing greater access to capital, networking, expertise and advice. Lending to women-owned businesses is a key priority of the program and thanks to the scale of our firm, we can have a major impact. By the end of 2021, our firm expects to extend $10 billion in credit to women-owned businesses.
JPMorgan Chase is also focused on educating women on managing their money, which in turn helps improve their economic security. This includes helping women grow their assets through banking and investment solutions. In addition, last year, the firm invested $55 million in philanthropic investments globally to help women improve their financial health, gain well-paying jobs and grow their small businesses. We are just getting started and plan to do much more.
With roots in thousands of local communities, we are excited to increase our commitment to the success of women and girls and to help secure an equal future for women in their professional and personal lives.
Head of Women on the Move, JPMorgan Chase & Co
Outside of the U.S., the U.K. introduced gender pay gap reporting regulations in 2017, applying to all public, private and voluntary sector organizations with more than 250 employees. So far this year, approximately 10% of firms have reported for 2018-2019, but early data shows the average reported pay gap (based on mean hourly pay) shrunk from 14.3% to 12.3%. However, the pay gap increased for many sectors, including financial services and construction, where the average reported difference in the mean hourly rate was 26% and 24.3%, respectively.
The median pay gap is greatly influenced by the representation of women at different levels of an organization and in these fields, there is lower representation of women in executive and other higher- paying roles. The data also revealed the gender pay gap tends to widen with the number of employees. The largest firms in the sample, with greater than 20,000 employees, reported an average difference in mean hourly pay of 16.5%, compared with firms with fewer than 250 employees, which reported an average gap of 9.1%. “A combination of government mandates, shareholder activism and advocacy efforts will likely lead to further progress toward gender balance goals over time,” said J.P. Morgan Fixed Income Strategist Phoebe White.
A Record in U.S. Politics
The greatest strides for women over the past year have arguably occurred in the political arena, with 2018 marked by an unprecedented number of electoral victories for women in the midterm U.S. congressional elections. Following Hillary Clinton’s loss in the 2016 presidential race, a record number of women ran for Congress. In total, 476 women ran for the U.S. House of Representatives and 53 women ran for the U.S. Senate, according to figures tabulated by the Center for American Progress. A record-breaking 131 women were elected to Congress, including 36 freshman women, meaning women now hold 24% of congressional seats according to the non-partisan Center for American Women and Politics.
women elected to
seats held by women
Source: Center for American Women and Politics
This compares to just 10% of congressional seats in 1992, which had been viewed as the last “break-through” year for women in politics – then setting a record, as female congressional representation doubled, compared with the 1988 elections.
Voting patterns also changed in the 2018 midterm elections, with Democrats scoring the highest margin of victory among women voters. There are also clear differences in female representation by political party, with the number of Republican women seated in the House of Representatives now at its lowest level since 1993-94, according to official data.
“2018 was marked by an unprecedented number of electoral victories for women in the midterm U.S. congressional elections. 2020 could bring a record number of female presidential candidates, with five major female candidates who currently serve as members of Congress already declaring their candidacy for the Democratic presidential nomination,” said J.P. Morgan Chair of Global Research, Joyce Chang.
But it remains an open question whether having a record number of women in office will result in legislative changes to close the gender pay gap. Discussions surrounding the Paycheck Fairness Act were raised in both chambers in January for the 11th time in the past 20 years. The bill would require employers to report job salaries, promotions and dismissals to the federal government, broken down by gender and race.
JPMorgan Chase’s Approach to
Pursuing gender equality is a top priority for JPMorgan Chase. Here are just some of our initiatives that focus on empowering and advancing our women employees and clients.
of the 256,000 people employed by JPMorgan Chase are women
of the JPMorgan Chase Operating Committee are women, as are 30% of the firm’s senior leaders
is invested in philanthropic efforts globally to help women improve their financial health, gain well-paying jobs and grow their businesses
Maternity Mothers Initiative
Excerpts from our award-winning Global Research.Learn more about Global Research
Explore corporate finance publications and insights.Learn more about Corporate Finance Advisory
The institute helps decision makers appreciate the scale, granularity, diversity, and interconnectedness of the global economic system and use better facts, real-time data, and thoughtful analysis to make smarter decisions.Learn more about JPMC Institute
This communication is provided for information purposes only. Please read J.P. Morgan research reports related to its contents for more information, including important disclosures. JPMorgan Chase & Co. or its affiliates and/or subsidiaries (collectively, J.P. Morgan) normally make a market and trade as principal in securities, other financial products and other asset classes that may be discussed in this communication.
This communication has been prepared based upon information, including market prices, data and other information, from sources believed to be reliable, but J.P. Morgan does not warrant its completeness or accuracy except with respect to any disclosures relative to J.P. Morgan and/or its affiliates and an analyst's involvement with any company (or security, other financial product or other asset class) that may be the subject of this communication. Any opinions and estimates constitute our judgment as of the date of this material and are subject to change without notice. Past performance is not indicative of future results. This communication is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument. J.P. Morgan Research does not provide individually tailored investment advice. Any opinions and recommendations herein do not take into account individual client circumstances, objectives, or needs and are not intended as recommendations of particular securities, financial instruments or strategies to particular clients. You must make your own independent decisions regarding any securities, financial instruments or strategies mentioned or related to the information herein. Periodic updates may be provided on companies, issuers or industries based on specific developments or announcements, market conditions or any other publicly available information. However, J.P. Morgan may be restricted from updating information contained in this communication for regulatory or other reasons. Clients should contact analysts and execute transactions through a J.P. Morgan subsidiary or affiliate in their home jurisdiction unless governing law permits otherwise.
This communication may not be redistributed or retransmitted, in whole or in part, or in any form or manner, without the express written consent of J.P. Morgan. Any unauthorized use or disclosure is prohibited. Receipt and review of this information constitutes your agreement not to redistribute or retransmit the contents and information contained in this communication without first obtaining express permission from an authorized officer of J.P. Morgan.