LONDON: J.P. Morgan Asset Management releases new research on risk parity
Sep 26, 2012
First of two papers focuses on hedging forecast uncertainty
London, 03 October 2012: J.P. Morgan Asset Management has released the first of two new research papers looking at risk parity, a much debated asset allocation strategy that is a hot topic among many institutional investors globally.
The research paper, entitled Improving on Risk Parity: Hedging Forecast Uncertainty, is authored by Peter Rappoport, Managing Director and Global Head of the Strategy Group at J.P. Morgan Asset Management. The research addresses some commonly held misconceptions about risk parity, but draws on some of risk parity’s strengths to propose an improved way of making asset allocation decisions.
Rappoport argues that allocating equal risk shares to asset classes as risk parity does cannot explain its past investment success. Equal risk shares, he says, is a “red herring” because the division of risk depends on how assets are defined, which is a purely cosmetic feature of a portfolio. However, in allocating equal risk shares, risk parity determines how to divide up a portfolio without using return forecasts. In contrast, standard asset allocation procedure relies heavily on forecasts.
Rappoport’s analysis shows that sometimes it is better to ignore forecasts than use them in the standard way. This is because forecasts of future returns are inherently “uncertain.” A forecast that equity returns will average 8% is a best guess, and does not rule out that the long term average could be 6% or 10%. However, the standard asset allocation model allows for no uncertainty, and can end up translating insignificant differences in forecasts into big differences in asset shares.
To deal with this problem, Rappoport proposes a hybrid strategy called the Forecast Hedge Rule. “This rule asks the investor for both forecasts of asset returns and a degree of confidence in them,” Rappoport said. “The asset allocation it produces shades towards risk parity the lower the confidence the investor expresses in the forecasts. Only in the limit of complete confidence, at the other extreme, will the resulting asset allocation reflect the standard procedure.”
Rappoport added: “I believe this research provides a novel perspective on risk parity, and gives our clients practical tools for their asset allocation.”
The research will be made available to UK institutional clients this week. Copies of the paper are available to journalists on request. The second paper, Diversification – still the only free lunch?, is by members of J.P. Morgan Asset Management’s Global Multi-Asset Group (GMAG), and will look at how some of the ideas in the first paper can be applied at a practical portfolio construction level. This paper is due to be released next week.
For further information please contact:
Media relations: Sarah Godfrey
Telephone: 020 7742 5950
Telephone: 020 7294 3689
Notes to Editors
About J.P. Morgan Asset Management
J.P. Morgan Asset Management is part of JPMorgan Chase & Co. and is a global asset management leader providing world-class investment solutions to clients. With US$1.3 trillion in assets under management (the Asset Management client funds of JP Morgan Chase & Co. as at 30 June 2012) and offices in 41 locations around the world, J.P. Morgan Asset Management offers global coverage with a strong local market presence, and leadership positions in most asset classes.
J.P. Morgan Asset Management is a trading name of J.P. Morgan Asset Management Marketing Limited which has issued this material in the United Kingdom and which is authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority. Registered in England No. 288553. Registered office: 25 Bank Street, Canary Wharf, London E14 5JP.
Any past performance referred to in this material is not a guide to future performance and the value of investments, and any income from them, can fall as well as rise. Any tax concessions referred to are not guaranteed and their value will depend on the individual circumstances of investors. Stock market linked investments carry a number of inherent risks. These risks will increase where fluctuations in exchange rates impact on the value of any underlying investments or where the investment is exposed to smaller companies or emerging markets. Investments in fixed income securities that are not rated as investment grade represent a greater risk to an investor’s capital.